• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A Cluster of Patients Infected with I221V Influenza B Virus Variants with Reduced Oseltamivir Susceptibility--North Carolina and South Carolina, 2010-

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis. 2012 Dec 13. [Epub ahead of print]
A Cluster of Patients Infected with I221V Influenza B Virus Variants with Reduced Oseltamivir Susceptibility--North Carolina and South Carolina, 2010-2011.
Garg S, Moore Z, Lee N, McKenna J, Bishop A, Fleischauer A, Springs CB, Nguyen HT, Sheu TG, Sleeman K, Finelli L, Gubareva L, Fry AM.
Source

Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract

Background. During 2010-2011, influenza B viruses with a novel neuraminidase substitution, denoted I221V, (B/I221V) associated with reduced in vitro oseltamivir susceptibility were detected in North Carolina (NC).Methods. We determined the prevalence of I221V among B viruses submitted to CDC for antiviral resistance surveillance, including all B viruses submitted to NC and South Carolina (SC) state laboratories, during October 2010-September 2011.We conducted chart reviews and phone interviews to characterize NC and SC patients with B/I221V versus wild-type B virus infection (B/WT).Results. We detected I221V in 45 (22%) of 209 B viruses from NC and 8 (10%) of 82 B viruses from SC. We detected I221V in three (0.3%) of 881 B viruses tested from 45 other states. B/I221V infection was not associated with differences in underlying conditions or illness severity compared with B/WT infection. No patients with B/I221V infection received oseltamivir prior to specimen collection. Among patients who completed oseltamivir, those with B/I221V infection reported a longer duration until illness resolution (5 versus 3 days); P=0.02.Conclusions. B/I221V co-circulated with B/WT in NC and SC during 2010-2011. I221V did not alter illness severity but may have reduced oseltamivir effectiveness. Thus, global surveillance for I221V is important.

PMID:
23242536
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23242536
 
Back
Top Bottom