• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2019 Dec 4. pii: S0264-410X(19)31589-0. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.047. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]A double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasally administered trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine with the adjuvant LTh(αK): A phase II study.[/h]
Pan SC[SUP]1[/SUP], Hsu WT[SUP]1[/SUP], Lee WS[SUP]2[/SUP], Wang NC[SUP]3[/SUP], Chen TJ[SUP]4[/SUP], Liu MC[SUP]5[/SUP], Pai HC[SUP]6[/SUP], Hsu YS[SUP]6[/SUP], Chang M[SUP]6[/SUP], Hsieh SM[SUP]7[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Medical Center, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. 4 Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 5 Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. 6 Advagene Biopharma Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan; Development Center for Biotechnology, New Taipei City, Taiwan. 7 Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: hsmaids@hotmail.com.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Intranasal influenza vaccines may provide protective efficacy by inducing both systemic antibodies and local secretory IgA. Live attenuated intranasal vaccines are not feasible for high-risk groups. A previously constructed inactivated vaccine with adjuvant revealed an association with neurological events in some studies. In this phase II trial, we aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an intranasal influenza vaccine with a novel adjuvant, heat-labile enterotoxin (LT)-derived from E. coli (LTh(αK)).
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled, double-blind, phase II trial of an intranasal influenza vaccine containing 22.5 μg of the hemagglutinin (HA) antigen of three influenza strains in combination with 2 different LTh(αK) adjuvant doses (group 1: 30 μg; group 2: 45 μg) in subjects 20-70 years old. The control vaccine was 22.5 μg of influenza HA antigen alone (group 3). The vaccine was intranasally administered on days 1 and 8. Serum anti-HA antibody and nasal secretory IgA were measured, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded prevaccination and 29 (?2) days postvaccination.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Of 354 participants randomized in the study, 340 received two vaccine doses. AEs were mostly mild, and there was no discontinuation related to the vaccine. Only a higher frequency of diarrhea after the first dose was noted among group 2 (11.5%) than among group 3 (2.8%), and there was no significant difference after the second dose. The three groups had comparable serum anti-HA antibody immunogenicity. However, the adjuvanted vaccines induced greater mucosal IgA antibody production than the control vaccine. In a subgroup analysis, group 1 participants achieved adequate immunogenicity among both 20- to 60- and 61- to 70-year-old participants.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The intranasal influenza vaccine adjuvanted with LTh(αK) is generally safe and could provide systemic and local antibody responses. Adjuvanted vaccines were significantly more immunogenic than the nonadjuvanted control vaccine in mucosal immunity. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03784885.
Copyright ? 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Adjuvant; Administration; Influenza vaccine; Intranasal; LTh(αK)

PMID: 31812463 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.047
 
Back
Top Bottom