• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

A prospective cohort study assessing the reactogenicity of pertussis and influenza vaccines administered during pregnancy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2016 Mar 30. pii: S0264-410X(16)30081-0. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.084. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]A prospective cohort study assessing the reactogenicity of pertussis and influenza vaccines administered during pregnancy.[/h] Regan AK[SUP]1[/SUP], Tracey LE[SUP]2[/SUP], Blyth CC[SUP]3[/SUP], Richmond PC[SUP]3[/SUP], Effler PV[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Pertussis vaccination during pregnancy can prevent 91% of infant infections. In 2015, antenatal pertussis vaccination programs were introduced across Australia.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] To monitor the safety of this program, pregnant women who received trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) and/or diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (dTpa) were surveyed by text message seven days post-vaccination about possible adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Univariate logistic regression models were used to calculate the odds of reporting an AEFI following dTpa compared to TIV. Similar analyses were used to compare AEFI reported by women who received a previous dose of dTpa in 2011/2012 as part of a state-wide cocooning program.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Of 5155 women, 4347 (84.3%) replied; 10.8% indicated they experienced an AEFI. There was no difference in the proportion of women who reported any reaction by vaccine; however, women who received dTpa were more likely to report a local reaction than women who received TIV (7.1% and 3.2%, respectively; OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.61-3.26). There was evidence suggesting local reactions were more common among women with a previous dose of dTpa (11.4%) compared to women with no previous dose (6.0%; OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 0.95-4.25); 11 (0.3%) women reported attending a hospital emergency department. Subsequent follow-up indicated symptoms resolved and mother and infant were healthy. There was no difference in the proportion of women attending hospital by vaccine (p>0.05).
[h=4]DISCUSSION:[/h] Data on systemic and local reactions following receipt of TIV and dTpa during pregnancy support the safety of antenatal vaccination.
Copyright ? 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Adverse events; Pertussis vaccine; Pregnancy; Safety; Seasonal influenza vaccine

PMID: 27038132 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom