tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Actas Dermosifiliogr
. 2023 Jun 16;S0001-7310(23)00498-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2023.05.024. Online ahead of print. A series of 69 COVID-related dermatoses with biopsy, immunohistochemistry with anti-Spike 3, in situ hybridization and PCR: a critical reappraisal of viral involvement in COVID-19 skin lesions
[Article in English, Spanish]
M Llamas-Velasco[SUP] 1 [/SUP], J Fraga[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ana Rodríguez-Villa Lario[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alba Catalá[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yosmar Carolina Pérez-González[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Cristina Galván[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde[SUP] 7 [/SUP], J Sánchez-Pérez[SUP] 8 [/SUP], T Wiesner[SUP] 9 [/SUP], D Metze[SUP] 10 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: Despite the large number of articles published on skin lesions related to COVID-19, clinicopathological correlation has not been performed consistently and immunohistochemistry to demonstrate spike 3 protein expression has not been validated through RT-PCR. We compiled 69 cases of patients with confirmed COVID-19, where skin lesions were clinically and histopathologically studied. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT-PCR was performed in skin biopsies.
Results: After a careful review of the cases, 15 were found to be dermatosis not related to COVID-19, while the rest of the lesions could be classified according to their clinical characteristics as vesicular (4), maculopapular eruptions (41), urticariform (9), livedo and necrosis (10) and pernio-like (5). Although histopathological features were similar to previously reported results, we found two previously unreported findings, maculopapular eruptions with squamous eccrine syringometaplasia and neutrophilic epitheliotropism. IHC showed in some cases endothelial and epidermal staining but RT-PCR was negative in all the tested cases. Thus, direct viral involvement could not be demonstrated.
Conclusions: Despite presenting the largest series of confirmed COVID-19 patients with histopathologically studied skin manifestations, direct viral involvement was difficult to establish. Vasculopatic and urticariform lesions seem to be those more clearly related to the viral infection, despite IHC or RT-PCR negative results failed to demonstrate viral presence. These findings, as in other dermatological areas, highlight the need of a clinico-pathological correlation to increase knowledge about viral involvement in COVID-19 skin-related lesions.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; compromiso cutáneo; correlación clínicopatológica; enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019; lesión cutánea.
. 2023 Jun 16;S0001-7310(23)00498-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2023.05.024. Online ahead of print. A series of 69 COVID-related dermatoses with biopsy, immunohistochemistry with anti-Spike 3, in situ hybridization and PCR: a critical reappraisal of viral involvement in COVID-19 skin lesions
[Article in English, Spanish]
M Llamas-Velasco[SUP] 1 [/SUP], J Fraga[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ana Rodríguez-Villa Lario[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alba Catalá[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yosmar Carolina Pérez-González[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Cristina Galván[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde[SUP] 7 [/SUP], J Sánchez-Pérez[SUP] 8 [/SUP], T Wiesner[SUP] 9 [/SUP], D Metze[SUP] 10 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37331619
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2023.05.024
Background: Despite the large number of articles published on skin lesions related to COVID-19, clinicopathological correlation has not been performed consistently and immunohistochemistry to demonstrate spike 3 protein expression has not been validated through RT-PCR. We compiled 69 cases of patients with confirmed COVID-19, where skin lesions were clinically and histopathologically studied. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT-PCR was performed in skin biopsies.
Results: After a careful review of the cases, 15 were found to be dermatosis not related to COVID-19, while the rest of the lesions could be classified according to their clinical characteristics as vesicular (4), maculopapular eruptions (41), urticariform (9), livedo and necrosis (10) and pernio-like (5). Although histopathological features were similar to previously reported results, we found two previously unreported findings, maculopapular eruptions with squamous eccrine syringometaplasia and neutrophilic epitheliotropism. IHC showed in some cases endothelial and epidermal staining but RT-PCR was negative in all the tested cases. Thus, direct viral involvement could not be demonstrated.
Conclusions: Despite presenting the largest series of confirmed COVID-19 patients with histopathologically studied skin manifestations, direct viral involvement was difficult to establish. Vasculopatic and urticariform lesions seem to be those more clearly related to the viral infection, despite IHC or RT-PCR negative results failed to demonstrate viral presence. These findings, as in other dermatological areas, highlight the need of a clinico-pathological correlation to increase knowledge about viral involvement in COVID-19 skin-related lesions.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; compromiso cutáneo; correlación clínicopatológica; enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019; lesión cutánea.