tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Case Rep
. 2022 Feb 14;23:e935414.
doi: 10.12659/AJCR.935414.
Recurrent COVID-19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Positivity in 2 Patients During the Current Health Care System Crisis
Anna Radlińska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ewelina Drytkiewicz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mateusz Patyk[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anna Zaleska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Dor-Wojnarowska[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is becoming challenging for public health crisis management. Effective detection method such as the criterion standard real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test is the only reliable option for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). RT-PCR detects the genetic material of the virus but does not distinguish the infectious periods. Other diagnostic methods as serological tests and computed tomography (CT) are less accurate but can provide complementary information, especially in the face of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Here, we report 2 cases of coronavirus-infected patients with recurrent RT-PCR positivity after recovery, which raised questions about possible reinfection. CASE REPORT A married couple, a 44-year-old woman and a 45-year-old man, after COVID-19 recovery, from April to August 2020 presented dynamic RT-PCR outcomes (oscillating from negative to positive). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels for both patients were 1000 U/ml, indicating seroconversion. As a result of recurrent positivity, the patients were isolated and had limited access to healthcare. In the follow-up period, combining RT-PCR results with serology testing and CT allowed determination of the patients' infectiousness. CONCLUSIONS Due to emerging coronavirus variants, individuals with dynamic PCR results, especially with post-COVID-19 syndrome, are indistinguishable from those who are infectious. Misdiagnosis causes unnecessary quarantines and exacerbates the health care crisis. Patients who had dynamic RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 require different diagnostics methods from those used in patients with a first-time positive test result. Combining diagnostic methods and identification of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 allows better estimation of the risk of reinfection.
. 2022 Feb 14;23:e935414.
doi: 10.12659/AJCR.935414.
Recurrent COVID-19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Positivity in 2 Patients During the Current Health Care System Crisis
Anna Radlińska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ewelina Drytkiewicz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mateusz Patyk[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anna Zaleska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Dor-Wojnarowska[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35153293
- DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.935414
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is becoming challenging for public health crisis management. Effective detection method such as the criterion standard real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test is the only reliable option for the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). RT-PCR detects the genetic material of the virus but does not distinguish the infectious periods. Other diagnostic methods as serological tests and computed tomography (CT) are less accurate but can provide complementary information, especially in the face of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Here, we report 2 cases of coronavirus-infected patients with recurrent RT-PCR positivity after recovery, which raised questions about possible reinfection. CASE REPORT A married couple, a 44-year-old woman and a 45-year-old man, after COVID-19 recovery, from April to August 2020 presented dynamic RT-PCR outcomes (oscillating from negative to positive). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels for both patients were 1000 U/ml, indicating seroconversion. As a result of recurrent positivity, the patients were isolated and had limited access to healthcare. In the follow-up period, combining RT-PCR results with serology testing and CT allowed determination of the patients' infectiousness. CONCLUSIONS Due to emerging coronavirus variants, individuals with dynamic PCR results, especially with post-COVID-19 syndrome, are indistinguishable from those who are infectious. Misdiagnosis causes unnecessary quarantines and exacerbates the health care crisis. Patients who had dynamic RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 require different diagnostics methods from those used in patients with a first-time positive test result. Combining diagnostic methods and identification of new variants of SARS-CoV-2 allows better estimation of the risk of reinfection.