• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Infect Control . Risk of COVID-19 in healthcare workers working in intensive care setting

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Infect Control


. 2022 Jan 23;S0196-6553(22)00017-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.01.003. Online ahead of print.
Risk of COVID-19 in healthcare workers working in intensive care setting


Majid M Alshamrani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aiman El-Saed[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yaseen M Arabi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mohammed Al Zunitan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fayssal M Farahat[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Henry Baffoe Bonnie[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Muayed Matalqa[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Fatmah Othman[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Saad Almohrij[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The higher risk of COVID-19 in healthcare workers (HCWs) is well-known. However, the risk within HCWs is not fully understood. The objective was to compare the COVID-19 risk in intensive care unit (ICU) versus non-ICU locations.
Methods: A prospective surveillance study was conducted among HCWs at a large tertiary care facility in Riyadh between March 1st to November 30th, 2020. HCWs included both clinical (provide direct patient care) and non-clinical positions (do not provide direct patient care).
Results: A total 1,594 HCWs with COVID-19 were included; 103 (6.5%) working in ICU and 1491 (93.5%) working in non-ICU locations. Compared with non-ICU locations, ICU had more nurses (54.4% versus 22.1%, p<0.001) and less support staff (2.9% versus 53.1%, p<0.001). COVID-19 infection was similar in ICU and non-ICU locations (9.0% versus 9.8%, p=0.374). However, it was significantly higher in ICU nurses (12.3% versus 6.5%, p<0.001). Support staff had higher risk than other HCWs, irrespective of ICU working status (15.1% versus 7.2%, p<0.001). The crude relative risk (RR) of COVID-19 in ICU versus non-ICU locations was 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] was 0.76-1.11 (p=0.374). However, RR adjusted for professional category was significantly increased to 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.50 (p=0.036).
Conclusion: ICU had a significantly higher risk of COVID-19 infection only after adjusting for the distribution and risk of different professional categories. The later is probably determined by both exposure level and protection practices. The finding underscores the importance of strict implementation of preventive measures among all HCWs, including those performing non-clinical services.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19); Saudi Arabia; healthcare workers; hospital; intensive care unit; professional category.
 
Back
Top Bottom