• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Obstet Gynecol . An internally validated prediction model for critical COVID-19 infection and intensive care unit admission in symptomatic pre

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Obstet Gynecol


. 2021 Sep 25;S0002-9378(21)01052-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.09.024. Online ahead of print.
An internally validated prediction model for critical COVID-19 infection and intensive care unit admission in symptomatic pregnant women


Erkan Kalafat[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Smriti Prasad[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pinar Birol[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Arzu Bilge Tekin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Atilla Kunt[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Carolina Di Fabrizio[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cengiz Alatas[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ebru Celik[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Helin Bagci[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Julia Binder[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Kirsty Le Doare[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Laura A Magee[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Memis Ali Mutlu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Murat Yassa[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Niyazi Tug[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Orhan Sahin[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Panagiotis Drokos[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Pat O'Brien[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Peter von Dadelszen[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Pilar Palmrich[SUP] 8 [/SUP], George Papaioannou[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Reyhan Ayaz[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Shamez N Ladhani[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Sophia Kalantaridou[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Veli Mihmanli[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Asma Khalil[SUP] 14 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Pregnant women are at increased risk of mortality and morbidity due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Many studies reported on the association of COVID-19 with pregnancy specific adverse outcomes but prediction models utilizing large cohort of pregnant women are still lacking for estimating the risk of maternal morbidity and other adverse events.
Objective: The main aim of this study was to develop a prediction model to quantify the risk of progression to critical COVID-19 and intensive care unit admission in pregnant women with symptomatic infection.
Study design: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study including eight hospitals from four countries (UK, Austria, Greece and Turkey). Data extraction was from February 2020 until May 2021. Included were consecutive pregnant and early postpartum women (within 10 days of birth), reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was progression to critical illness requiring intensive care. Secondary outcomes included maternal death, preeclampsia and stillbirth. The association between the primary outcome and 12 candidate predictors with known association with severe COVID-19 in pregnancy, was analyzed with log-binomial mixed-effects regression and reported as adjusted risk ratios (aRR). All potential predictors were evaluated in one model and only baseline factors in another. Predictive accuracy were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC).
Results: Of 793 pregnant women positive for SARS-CoV-2 and symptomatic, 44 (5.5%) were admitted to intensive care, of whom 10 died (1.3%). The 'mini-COvid Maternal Intensive Therapy' model included demographic and clinical variables available at disease onset: maternal age (aRR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.07-1.95, P=0.015); body-mass index (aRR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06-1.66, P=0.010); and diagnosis in the third trimester of pregnancy (aRR: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.78-8.46, P=0.001). The optimism-adjusted AUROC was 0.73. The 'full-COvid Maternal Intensive Therapy' model included body-mass index (aRR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07-1.95, P=0.015), lower respiratory symptoms (aRR: 5.11, 95% CI: 1.81-21.4, P=0.007), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (aRR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.36-1.89, P<0.001); and serum C-reactive protein (aRR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.15-1.44, P<0.001), with an optimism-adjusted AUROC 0.85. Neither model showed signs of poor fit (P>0.05). Categorization as high risk by either model was associated with a shorter diagnosis to ICU admission interval (log-rank test P<0.001, both), higher maternal death (5.2% vs. 0.2%; P<0.0001) and preeclampsia (5.7% vs. 1.0%; P=0.0003). A spreadsheet calculator is available for risk estimation.
Conclusion: At presentation with symptomatic COVID-19, pregnant and recently postpartum women can be stratified into high and low-risk for progression to critical disease, even where resources are limited. This can support the nature and place of care. These models also highlight the independent risk for severe disease associated with obesity, and should further emphasize that even in the absence of other co-morbidities, vaccination is particularly important for these women. Finally, the model also provides useful information for policy makers when prioritizing national vaccination programmes to quickly protect those at highest risk of critical and fatal COVID-19.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; calibration; prediction; pregnancy; risk estimation; vaccination.
 
Back
Top Bottom