• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Reprod Immunol . A Decrease of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Does Not Reflect a Decrease of Neutralization Rate: A Prospective Study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Reprod Immunol


. 2025 Feb;93(2):e70053.
doi: 10.1111/aji.70053. A Decrease of Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Does Not Reflect a Decrease of Neutralization Rate: A Prospective Study to Evaluate Kinetic and Dynamic Humoral Immune Response After Vaccination During Pregnancy

Gabriela Mattoso Coelho[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hellen Geremias Dos Santos[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Allan Henrique Depieri Cataneo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yara Zancanaro[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Gabriela Lunardelli[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Taciane Elisabete Cesca[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jaqueline Makiyama[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jean Alexandre Furtado Correa Francisco[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Thelma Skare[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Felipe Francisco Tuon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Camila Zanluca[SUP] 1 [/SUP], João Paulo Telles[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Claudia Nunes Duarte Dos Santos[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Problem: Despite being at increased risk for severe COVID-19, pregnant women were initially excluded from vaccine clinical trials, which limited data regarding vaccine effectiveness and protection in this group. Aiming to better understand the immune response to vaccination during pregnancy, we compared the kinetics and titers of neutralizing and IgG antibodies generated against SARS-CoV-2 during vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech) in a cohort of pregnant women.
Methods of study: We evaluated participants before vaccination and 30 days after each vaccine dose, using a multiplex bead assay to measure IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 antigens (total spike, spike-1, spike-2, receptor binding domain, and nucleocapsid) and a live virus fluorescence reduction neutralization assay (FRNA) to quantify neutralizing antibodies.
Results: Our data showed that vaccination resulted in a robust humoral response, with a considerable increase in the levels of IgG and neutralizing antibodies after the first vaccine dose and a sustained neutralizing response after the vaccine boost. In addition, antispike IgG assays presented a slight decrease after the second dose, while the neutralization rate remained stable.
Conclusions: Immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in pregnant women demonstrated an important increase in neutralizing antibodies.

Keywords: COVID‐19 vaccine; SARS‐CoV‐2; humoral response; maternal immunity; neutralizing antibodies; pregnancy.

 
Back
Top Bottom