• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Am J Transl Res . Factors affecting recurrent positive RT-PCR results in clinically cured COVID-19 patients: a multicenter study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Transl Res


. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):6191-6199.
eCollection 2021.
Factors affecting recurrent positive RT-PCR results in clinically cured COVID-19 patients: a multicenter study


You Zou[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jia-Ni Zou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ya-Se Zhuang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Bin-Ru Wang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Liu Sun[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Shan Xu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sheng-Lan Li[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Li-Jun Shen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Geng-Tian Liang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Qing-Quan Hua[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Wen-Cai Huang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shi-Ming Chen[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the recurrence of positive RT-PCR results. By performing a retrospective analysis, we evaluated the clinical data of recurrent positive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in multiple medical institutions in Wuhan. We recruited COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized from January 1 to March 10, 2020, in three tertiary hospitals in Wuhan, met the discharge criteria and received at least one additional nucleic acid test before leaving the hospital. According to the RT-PCR results, patients were split into a recurrent positive group (RPos group) and a nonrecurrent positive group (non-RPos group). Clinical characteristics, therapeutic schedules and antibody titers were compared between the two groups. AI-assisted chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) technology was applied to investigate pulmonary inflammatory exudation and compare the extent of lung areas with different densities. This study involved 122 COVID-19 patients. There were no significant differences in age, sex, preexisting diseases, clinical symptoms, clinical classification, course of disease, therapeutic schedules or serum-specific antibodies between the two groups. A higher proportion of patients who showed pulmonary inflammatory exudation on HRCT scans were recurrent positive at the time of discharge than other patients (81.6% vs 13.7%, P < 0.01). In addition, the degree of pulmonary fibrosis was higher in the RPos group than in the non-RPos group (P < 0.05). Subpleural exudation at the peripheral edge of the lung and extensive pulmonary fibrosis at the time of discharge represent risk factors for the recurrence of COVID-19.

Keywords: AI-assisted; COVID-19; CT; recurrent positive.
 
Back
Top Bottom