• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Ann Intensive Care . Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not associated with survival in ac

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator

Ann Intensive Care


. 2022 Jan 13;12(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-00980-3.
Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is not associated with survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by coronavirus disease 2019


Martina Hermann[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Daniel Laxar[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christoph Krall[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christina Hafner[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Oliver Herzog[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Oliver Kimberger[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sebastian Koenig[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Felix Kraft[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mathias Maleczek[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Klaus Markstaller[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Oliver Robak[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bernhard Rössler[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eva Schaden[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Peter Schellongowski[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mathias Schneeweiss-Gleixner[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Thomas Staudinger[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Roman Ullrich[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marion Wiegele[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Harald Willschke[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Christian Zauner[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Alexander Hermann[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) prior to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) affects outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) related ARDS, the role of pre-ECMO IMV duration is unclear. This single-centre, retrospective study included critically ill adults treated with ECMO due to severe COVID-19-related ARDS between 01/2020 and 05/2021. The primary objective was to determine whether duration of IMV prior to ECMO cannulation influenced ICU mortality.
Results: During the study period, 101 patients (mean age 56 [SD ± 10] years; 70 [69%] men; median RESP score 2 [IQR 1-4]) were treated with ECMO for COVID-19. Sixty patients (59%) survived to ICU discharge. Median ICU length of stay was 31 [IQR 20.7-51] days, median ECMO duration was 16.4 [IQR 8.7-27.7] days, and median time from intubation to ECMO start was 7.7 [IQR 3.6-12.5] days. Fifty-three (52%) patients had a pre-ECMO IMV duration of > 7 days. Pre-ECMO IMV duration had no effect on survival (p = 0.95). No significant difference in survival was found when patients with a pre-ECMO IMV duration of < 7 days (< 10 days) were compared to ≥ 7 days (≥ 10 days) (p = 0.59 and p = 1.0).
Conclusions: The role of prolonged pre-ECMO IMV duration as a contraindication for ECMO in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS should be scrutinised. Evaluation for ECMO should be assessed on an individual and patient-centred basis.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Invasive mechanical ventilation.
 
Back
Top Bottom