• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Ann Intensive Care . Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Ann Intensive Care


. 2021 Dec 11;11(1):170.
doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00956-9.
Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores


Matthieu Schmidt[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Bertrand Guidet[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Alexandre Demoule[SUP] 4 6 7 [/SUP], Maharajah Ponnaiah[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Muriel Fartoukh[SUP] 4 9 10 [/SUP], Louis Puybasset[SUP] 11 12 [/SUP], Alain Combes[SUP] 8 13 4 [/SUP], David Hajage[SUP] 14 [/SUP], COVID-ICU Investigators



Collaborators, Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Predicting outcomes of critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) is a major challenge to avoid futile, and prolonged ICU stays.
Methods: The objective was to develop predictive survival models for patients with COVID-19 after 1-to-2 weeks in ICU. Based on the COVID-ICU cohort, which prospectively collected characteristics, management, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Machine learning was used to develop dynamic, clinically useful models able to predict 90-day mortality using ICU data collected on day (D) 1, D7 or D14.
Results: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC)-1, SOSIC-7, and SOSIC-14 scores were constructed with 4244, 2877, and 1349 patients, respectively, randomly assigned to development or test datasets. The three models selected 15 ICU-entry variables recorded on D1, D7, or D14. Cardiovascular, renal, and pulmonary functions on prediction D7 or D14 were among the most heavily weighted inputs for both models. For the test dataset, SOSIC-7's area under the ROC curve was slightly higher (0.80 [0.74-0.86]) than those for SOSIC-1 (0.76 [0.71-0.81]) and SOSIC-14 (0.76 [0.68-0.83]). Similarly, SOSIC-1 and SOSIC-7 had excellent calibration curves, with similar Brier scores for the three models.
Conclusion: The SOSIC scores showed that entering 15 to 27 baseline and dynamic clinical parameters into an automatable XGBoost algorithm can potentially accurately predict the likely 90-day mortality post-ICU admission (sosic.shinyapps.io/shiny). Although external SOSIC-score validation is still needed, it is an additional tool to strengthen decisions about life-sustaining treatments and informing family members of likely prognosis.

Keywords: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19; Mechanical ventilation; Outcome; Predictive survival model.
 
Back
Top Bottom