tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Antivir Ther
. 2024 Aug;29(4):13596535241264694.
doi: 10.1177/13596535241264694. Clinical outcomes in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 treated with monoclonal antibody therapy versus an untreated control cohort
Courtney N Nichols[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mark Lustberg[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mohammed Mahdee E Sobhanie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lucia J Niermann[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Melissa Gordon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nicholas Kman[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jonathan Parsons[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mark Conroy[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michael Dick[SUP] 4 [/SUP], James Allen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Erica Reed[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Joy Lehman[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Carlos Malvestutto[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in adults at a high-risk for progression to severe disease in November 2020. This study assessed the impact of MAT on clinical outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study comparing 30-day COVID-19-related emergency department (ED) visits, admissions, and mortality in patients receiving MAT (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab-etesevimab, or casirivimab-imdevimab) between 16 November 2020 and 19 June 2021, compared to a control group of high-risk adults diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 prior to MAT availability between 16 May 2020 and 15 November 2020. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis with backward selection to determine the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval evaluating the relationship between clinical characteristics and outcomes.
Results: 1187 patients who received MAT were compared to 1103 patients not treated with MAT. Multivariable regression model adjusted for possible confounders showed patients who received MAT had lower rates of ED visits (3.2% vs 7.4%, OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.31-0.70, p < .001) and hospital admissions (4.3% vs 7.8%, OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.29-0.62, p < .001) compared to the control group. After adjusting for confounders, MAT was associated with decreased mortality (OR = 0.36, p = .035). In the MAT group, those treated within 2 days of COVID-19 diagnosis had lower mortality than those treated more than 2 days post-diagnosis (unadjusted OR = 0.152, 95% CI = 0.031-0.734, p = .019).
Conclusions: Individuals treated with MAT had lower rates of 30-day COVID-19-related ED visits and hospital admissions compared to those not receiving MAT. Early MAT resulted in lower 30-day mortality compared to receipt >2 days post COVID-19 diagnosis.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antiviral therapy; monoclonal antibody therapy; treatment.
. 2024 Aug;29(4):13596535241264694.
doi: 10.1177/13596535241264694. Clinical outcomes in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 treated with monoclonal antibody therapy versus an untreated control cohort
Courtney N Nichols[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mark Lustberg[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mohammed Mahdee E Sobhanie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lucia J Niermann[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Melissa Gordon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nicholas Kman[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jonathan Parsons[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mark Conroy[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Michael Dick[SUP] 4 [/SUP], James Allen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Erica Reed[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Joy Lehman[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Carlos Malvestutto[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39066463
- DOI: 10.1177/13596535241264694
Background: Monoclonal antibody therapy (MAT) received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for mild to moderate COVID-19 treatment in adults at a high-risk for progression to severe disease in November 2020. This study assessed the impact of MAT on clinical outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study comparing 30-day COVID-19-related emergency department (ED) visits, admissions, and mortality in patients receiving MAT (bamlanivimab, bamlanivimab-etesevimab, or casirivimab-imdevimab) between 16 November 2020 and 19 June 2021, compared to a control group of high-risk adults diagnosed with mild to moderate COVID-19 prior to MAT availability between 16 May 2020 and 15 November 2020. Statistical analysis used logistic regression analysis with backward selection to determine the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval evaluating the relationship between clinical characteristics and outcomes.
Results: 1187 patients who received MAT were compared to 1103 patients not treated with MAT. Multivariable regression model adjusted for possible confounders showed patients who received MAT had lower rates of ED visits (3.2% vs 7.4%, OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.31-0.70, p < .001) and hospital admissions (4.3% vs 7.8%, OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.29-0.62, p < .001) compared to the control group. After adjusting for confounders, MAT was associated with decreased mortality (OR = 0.36, p = .035). In the MAT group, those treated within 2 days of COVID-19 diagnosis had lower mortality than those treated more than 2 days post-diagnosis (unadjusted OR = 0.152, 95% CI = 0.031-0.734, p = .019).
Conclusions: Individuals treated with MAT had lower rates of 30-day COVID-19-related ED visits and hospital admissions compared to those not receiving MAT. Early MAT resulted in lower 30-day mortality compared to receipt >2 days post COVID-19 diagnosis.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antiviral therapy; monoclonal antibody therapy; treatment.