• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Arch Pathol Lab Med . Anti-Receptor-Binding Domain Immunoglobulin G Antibody as a Predictor of Seropositivity for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Anti

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Arch Pathol Lab Med


. 2022 Apr 5.
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0041-SA. Online ahead of print.
Anti-Receptor-Binding Domain Immunoglobulin G Antibody as a Predictor of Seropositivity for Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody


Jian-Hang Xue[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Yong-Jing Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wei Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qiu-Ling Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qiu-Yan Xu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jian-Jun Niu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Li-Li Liu[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Context.—: Neutralizing antibody detection can assess the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the effectiveness of vaccines. However, commercial reagents for neutralizing antibodies were developed after the anti- severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM antibodies. Therefore, some laboratories did not perform neutralizing antibody testing services due to multiple factors.
Objective.—: To find a fast, accurate, and economical alternative for the detection of neutralizing antibodies for the development of COVID-19 screening programs.
Design.—: The response and correlation of three antibodies (anti-spike protein (S) neutralizing antibody, total anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody, and anti-RBD IgG) was determined by observing the dynamics in 61 participants for 160 days post vaccination.
Results.—: The levels of neutralizing and anti-RBD IgG antibodies reached their peak values on day 42 post vaccination (120.75 IU/mL and 14.38 signal-to-cutoff ratio [S/CO], respectively). The total antibody levels peaked at 138.47 S/CO on day 35 post vaccination. The strongest correlation was found between neutralizing and anti-RBD IgG antibody levels (r = 0.894, P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) for total antibody levels for the prediction of seropositivity for neutralizing antibodies was 0.881 (P < .001) and that for anti-RBD IgG antibody levels was 0.937 (P < .001).
Conclusions.—: Neutralizing and anti-RBD IgG antibody levels were strongly correlated, and thus anti-RBD IgG antibody levels can be used for accurate assessment of immunity following SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.
 
Back
Top Bottom