• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Arthritis Research &Therapy: Impact of anti-rheumatic treatment on immunogenicity of pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine in patients with arthritis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
IntroductionAn adjuvanted pandemic H1N1 influenza (pH1N1) vaccine (Pandemrix(R)) was reported as highly immunogenic resulting in seroconversion in 77 to 94% of adults after administration of a single dose. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of different anti-rheumatic treatments on antibody response to pH1N1 vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondylarthropathy (SpA).

Methods: Patients with arthritis (n = 291; mean age 57 years, 64% women) participated.

Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay was performed on blood samples drawn before and after a mean (SD) of 8.3 (4) months following vaccination. A positive immune response i.e.

seroconversion was defined as negative prevaccination serum and postvaccination HI titer >=40 or a >=4-fold increase in HI titer. All patients were divided into predefined groups based on diagnosis (RA or SpA) and ongoing treatment: methotrexate (MTX), anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) as monotherapy, MTX combined with anti-TNF, other biologics (abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)/analgesics.

Predictors of positive immune response were studied using logistic regression analysis.

Results: The percentage of patients with positive immune response in the different treatment groups were: 1. RA on MTX 42% 2.

RA on anti-TNF monotherapy 53% 3. RA on anti-TNF + MTX 43% 4.

RA on other biologics (abatacept 20%, rituximab 10% and tocilizumab 50%) 5. SpA on anti-TNF monotherapy 76% 6.

SpA on anti-TNF + MTX 47% and 7. SpA on NSAIDs/analgesics 59%.

RA patients on rituximab had significantly lower (P <0.001) and SpA on anti-TNF monotherapy significantly better response rates compared to other treatment groups (P 0.001 to 0.033). Higher age (P <0.001) predicted impaired immune response.

Antibody titers 3 to 6 months after vaccination were generally lower compared to those within the first 3 months but no further decrease in titers were observed 6 to 22 months after vaccination.

Conclusions: Rituximab treatment severely reduced antibody response to pH1N1 influenza vaccine. The other treatment groups showed acceptable antibody responses.

Protective antibody titers could be detected up to 22 months after vaccination in the current patient population, with the exception of rituximab treated patients.

Author: Meliha C KapetanovicLars-Erik KristensenTore SaxneTeodora AktasAndreas MörnerPierre Geborek
Credits/Source: Arthritis Research &Therapy 2014, 16:R2

http://7thspace.com/headlines/44968...uenza_vaccine_in_patients_with_arthritis.html
 
Back
Top Bottom