• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Avian Pathol . Comparative examination of a rapid immunocytochemical test for the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in domestic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Avian Pathol


. 2024 Feb 19:1-17.
doi: 10.1080/03079457.2024.2320699. Online ahead of print. Comparative examination of a rapid immunocytochemical test for the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in domestic birds, in field outbreaks

Levente Szeredi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ákos Thuma[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Éva Gyuris[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Krisztina Ursu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ádám Bálint[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Norbert Solymosi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The quantitative real time reverse polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) is to date the preferred test method for the diagnosis of avian influenza (AI), which can be performed only in specialized laboratories. Different antigen detection methods for the diagnosis of AI were previously reported to be specific and sensitive in field outbreaks. These tests can be performed in simple country site labs. Brain smears of domestic birds (n = 105) collected during AI field outbreaks were examined with immunocytochemistry (IC). The results were statistically analyzed by comparing IC to brain histology (BH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC), to gross pathological examination (GP) (n = 105) and to RRT-PCR (n = 91). AI was diagnosed with RRT-PCR in 66 cases. IC and IHC were positive in 59/66 (90 %) and 60/66 (91 %) cases respectively. Lesions suspicious for AI were detected with GP and HP in 66/66 (100 %) and 61/66 (92 %) cases respectively. An almost perfect agreement was found between RRT-PCR, IC, IHC, and HP. Substantial agreement was found between IC and GP, between IHC and GP, between HP and GP, and between RRT-PCR and GP. The chromogen-based IC test presented in this study is allowed to produce a durable staining, which can be evaluated using a simple brightfield microscope. The test is rapid (can be completed in 2 hours), sensitive (90 %), specific (100 %), and cost-effective, which made the method suitable for routine diagnostic test in AI epidemics.

Keywords: Avian influenza; brain; diagnosis; domestic bird; field outbreak; immunocytochemistry.

 
Back
Top Bottom