• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Geriatr . Examining the immunological responses to COVID-19 vaccination in multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Geriatr


. 2024 May 8;24(1):411.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05006-0. Examining the immunological responses to COVID-19 vaccination in multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hamid Harandi[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Parisa Fallahtafti[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Amirali Karimi[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Seyedeh Melika Hashemi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mehrdad Mahalleh[SUP] 2 6 [/SUP], Moein Ashouri[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mohammad Amin Salehi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Armin Hoveidaei[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Impaired immune response in multiple myeloma renders the patients vulnerable to infections, such as COVID-19, and may cause worse response to vaccines. Researchers should analyze this issue to enable the planning for special preventive measures, such as increased booster doses. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the response and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple myeloma.
Methods: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, conducting a comprehensive database search using specified keywords. Study selection involved a two-phase title/abstract and full-text screening process. Data extraction was performed by two researchers, and statistical analysis involved meta-analysis, subgroup analysis based on vaccine dosage and study time, random effects meta-regression, and heterogeneity testing using the Q test.
Results: The meta-analysis revealed that patients with multiple myeloma (MM) had a lower likelihood of developing detectable antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination compared to healthy controls (Log odds ratio with 95% CI: -3.34 [-4.08, -2.60]). The analysis of antibody response after different doses showed consistent lower seropositivity in MM patients (after first dose: -2.09, [-3.49, -0.69], second: -3.80, 95%CI [-4.71, -3.01], a booster dose: -3.03, [-5.91, -0.15]). However, there was no significant difference in the mean level of anti-S antibodies between MM patients and controls (Cohen's d -0.72, [-1.86, 0.43]). Evaluation of T-cell responses indicated diminished T-cell-mediated immunity in MM patients compared to controls. Seven studies reported clinical response, with breakthrough infections observed in vaccinated MM patients.
Conclusions: These findings highlight the impaired humoral and cellular immune responses in MM patients after COVID-19 vaccination, suggesting the need for further investigation and potential interventions.

Keywords: COVID-19; Multiple myeloma; Plasma cell dyscrasia; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine.

 
Back
Top Bottom