tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis
. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):915.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06586-7.
Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel
Iris Leister[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Elisabeth Ponocny-Seliger[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 4 [/SUP], Herwig Kollaritsch[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Peter Dungel[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Barbara Holzer[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Johannes Grillari[SUP] 6 7 9 [/SUP], Heinz Redl[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Ivo Ponocny[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Claudia Wilfing[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ludwig Aigner[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Markus Exner[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Michaela Stainer[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Matthias Hackl[SUP] 7 12 [/SUP], Thomas Hausner[SUP] 6 7 13 [/SUP], Rainer Mittermayr[SUP] 6 7 13 [/SUP], Wolfgang Schaden[SUP] 6 7 14 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study are to determine (i) SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive employees in Austrian trauma hospitals and rehabilitation facilities, (ii) number of active virus carriers (symptomatic and asymptomatic) during the study, (iii) antibody decline in seropositive subjects over a period of around 6 months, (iv) the usefulness of rapid antibody tests for outpatient screening.
Method: A total of 3301 employees in 11 Austrian trauma hospitals and rehabilitation facilities of the Austrian Social Insurance for Occupational Risks (AUVA) participated in this open uncontrolled prospective cohort study. Rapid lateral flow tests, detecting a combination of IgM and IgM against SARS-CoV-2), two different types of CLIA (Diasorin, Roche), RT-PCR tests and serum neutralization tests (SNTs) were performed. The tests were conducted twice, with an interval of 42.4 ± 7.7 (Min = 30, Max = 64) days. Positive participants were re-tested with CLIA/SNT at a third time point after 188.0 ± 12.8 days.
Results: Only 27 out of 3301 participants (0.82%) had a positive antibody test at any time point during the study confirmed via neutralization test. Among positively tested participants in either test, 50.4% did not report any symptoms consistent with common manifestations of COVID-19 during the study period or within the preceding 6 weeks. In the group who tested positive during or prior to study inclusion the most common symptoms of an acute viral illness were rhinitis (21.9%), and loss of taste and olfactory sense (21.9%). Based on the neutralization test as the true condition, the rapid antibody test performed better on serum than whole blood as 84.6% instead of 65.4% could be detected correctly. Concerning both CLIA tests overall the Roche test detected 24 (sensitivity = 88.9%) and the Diasorin test 22 positive participants (sensitivity = 81.5%). In participants with a positive SNT result, a significant drop in neutralizing antibody titre from 31.8 ± 22.9 (Md = 32.0) at T1 to 26.1 ± 17.6 (Md = 21.3) at T2 to 21.4 ± 13.4 (Md = 16.0) at T3 (χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 23.848, df = 2, p < 0.001) was observed (χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 23.848, df = 2, p < 0.001)-with an average time of 42.4 ± 7.7 days between T1 and T2 and 146.9 ± 13.8 days between T2 and T3.
Conclusions: During the study period (May 11th-August 3rd) only 0.82% were tested positive for antibodies in our study cohort. The antibody concentration decreases significantly over time with 14.8% (4 out of 27) losing detectable antibodies.
Keywords: COVID-19 diagnostic testing; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):915.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06586-7.
Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel
Iris Leister[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Elisabeth Ponocny-Seliger[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 4 [/SUP], Herwig Kollaritsch[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Peter Dungel[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Barbara Holzer[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Johannes Grillari[SUP] 6 7 9 [/SUP], Heinz Redl[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Ivo Ponocny[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Claudia Wilfing[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ludwig Aigner[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Markus Exner[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Michaela Stainer[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Matthias Hackl[SUP] 7 12 [/SUP], Thomas Hausner[SUP] 6 7 13 [/SUP], Rainer Mittermayr[SUP] 6 7 13 [/SUP], Wolfgang Schaden[SUP] 6 7 14 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34488680
- DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06586-7
Abstract
Background: The aims of this study are to determine (i) SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive employees in Austrian trauma hospitals and rehabilitation facilities, (ii) number of active virus carriers (symptomatic and asymptomatic) during the study, (iii) antibody decline in seropositive subjects over a period of around 6 months, (iv) the usefulness of rapid antibody tests for outpatient screening.
Method: A total of 3301 employees in 11 Austrian trauma hospitals and rehabilitation facilities of the Austrian Social Insurance for Occupational Risks (AUVA) participated in this open uncontrolled prospective cohort study. Rapid lateral flow tests, detecting a combination of IgM and IgM against SARS-CoV-2), two different types of CLIA (Diasorin, Roche), RT-PCR tests and serum neutralization tests (SNTs) were performed. The tests were conducted twice, with an interval of 42.4 ± 7.7 (Min = 30, Max = 64) days. Positive participants were re-tested with CLIA/SNT at a third time point after 188.0 ± 12.8 days.
Results: Only 27 out of 3301 participants (0.82%) had a positive antibody test at any time point during the study confirmed via neutralization test. Among positively tested participants in either test, 50.4% did not report any symptoms consistent with common manifestations of COVID-19 during the study period or within the preceding 6 weeks. In the group who tested positive during or prior to study inclusion the most common symptoms of an acute viral illness were rhinitis (21.9%), and loss of taste and olfactory sense (21.9%). Based on the neutralization test as the true condition, the rapid antibody test performed better on serum than whole blood as 84.6% instead of 65.4% could be detected correctly. Concerning both CLIA tests overall the Roche test detected 24 (sensitivity = 88.9%) and the Diasorin test 22 positive participants (sensitivity = 81.5%). In participants with a positive SNT result, a significant drop in neutralizing antibody titre from 31.8 ± 22.9 (Md = 32.0) at T1 to 26.1 ± 17.6 (Md = 21.3) at T2 to 21.4 ± 13.4 (Md = 16.0) at T3 (χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 23.848, df = 2, p < 0.001) was observed (χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 23.848, df = 2, p < 0.001)-with an average time of 42.4 ± 7.7 days between T1 and T2 and 146.9 ± 13.8 days between T2 and T3.
Conclusions: During the study period (May 11th-August 3rd) only 0.82% were tested positive for antibodies in our study cohort. The antibody concentration decreases significantly over time with 14.8% (4 out of 27) losing detectable antibodies.
Keywords: COVID-19 diagnostic testing; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.