tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis
. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):858.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08682-2. Effectiveness of inspector mechanism for the emergency infection prevention and control in the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic period: a self-control real-word study
Yu Lv[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qian Xiang[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xiaoyan Jiang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bo Zhang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jiayu Wu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hongrong Cao[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: To ensure emergency infection prevention and control (IPC) can be fully supervised and monitored in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic period, a three-level inspector mechanism called "Internal self-check, Departmental cross-check, and Verification of outstanding key and difficult issues" was established in southwest China. The present study aimed to explore the effectiveness of inspector mechanism for the emergency IPC.
Methods: A self-control real-world study was conducted during COVID-19 epidemic period from 2020 to 2022. An innovative designed mobile phone application was used to realize paperless information transmission and data management. Data were compared between inspection levels using SPSS 19.0 software.
Results: A total of 2,800,132 supervision records were collected, including 149,137 comprehensive epidemic IPC projects, 1,410,093 personal protective equipment (PPE) use, 1,223,595 wearing and removing process of PPE and 17,307 ultraviolet light-detectable fluorescent (UV/F) surface marker. During the study period, the inspectors and subjects explored many optimized IPC measures. The compliance rate of check items has exceeded 98%, and internal self-check has a statistically significant higher rate than departmental cross-check (99.95% versus 98.74%, χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 26111.479, P < 0.001). Compare with the failure rate in internal self check, the failure rate of PPE usage and wearing/removing process was statistically higher in departmental cross-check (χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 1957.987, P < 0.001, χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 465.610, P < 0.001, respectively). The overall clearance rate of UV/F surface markers is 87.88%, but there is no statistically significant difference over the three years of the present study (F = 2.902, P = 0.071).
Conclusions: Inspector mechanism for the emergency IPC completed an incredible inspection workload and offered creative assistance to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. These methods and accumulated experiences should be helpful for us to strengthen IPC for future epidemic.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Infection prevention and control; Inspector mechanism; SARS.
. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):858.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08682-2. Effectiveness of inspector mechanism for the emergency infection prevention and control in the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic period: a self-control real-word study
Yu Lv[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qian Xiang[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xiaoyan Jiang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bo Zhang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jiayu Wu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hongrong Cao[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38057717
- DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08682-2
Background: To ensure emergency infection prevention and control (IPC) can be fully supervised and monitored in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic period, a three-level inspector mechanism called "Internal self-check, Departmental cross-check, and Verification of outstanding key and difficult issues" was established in southwest China. The present study aimed to explore the effectiveness of inspector mechanism for the emergency IPC.
Methods: A self-control real-world study was conducted during COVID-19 epidemic period from 2020 to 2022. An innovative designed mobile phone application was used to realize paperless information transmission and data management. Data were compared between inspection levels using SPSS 19.0 software.
Results: A total of 2,800,132 supervision records were collected, including 149,137 comprehensive epidemic IPC projects, 1,410,093 personal protective equipment (PPE) use, 1,223,595 wearing and removing process of PPE and 17,307 ultraviolet light-detectable fluorescent (UV/F) surface marker. During the study period, the inspectors and subjects explored many optimized IPC measures. The compliance rate of check items has exceeded 98%, and internal self-check has a statistically significant higher rate than departmental cross-check (99.95% versus 98.74%, χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 26111.479, P < 0.001). Compare with the failure rate in internal self check, the failure rate of PPE usage and wearing/removing process was statistically higher in departmental cross-check (χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 1957.987, P < 0.001, χ[SUP]2[/SUP] = 465.610, P < 0.001, respectively). The overall clearance rate of UV/F surface markers is 87.88%, but there is no statistically significant difference over the three years of the present study (F = 2.902, P = 0.071).
Conclusions: Inspector mechanism for the emergency IPC completed an incredible inspection workload and offered creative assistance to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. These methods and accumulated experiences should be helpful for us to strengthen IPC for future epidemic.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Infection prevention and control; Inspector mechanism; SARS.