tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis
. 2021 Aug 25;21(1):871.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06438-4.
Low Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Rhode Island blood donors during may 2020 as determined using multiple serological assay formats
Daniel J Nesbitt[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel P Jin[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joseph W Hogan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jenny Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Haidee Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Philip A Chan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Melissa J Simon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Matthew Vargas[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ewa King[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Richard C Huard[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Utpala Bandy[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christopher D Hillyer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Larry L Luchsinger[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Epidemic projections and public health policies addressing Coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 have been implemented without data reporting on the seroconversion of the population since scalable antibody testing has only recently become available.
Methods: We measured the percentage of severe acute respiratory syndrome- Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) seropositive individuals from 2008 blood donors drawn in the state of Rhode Island (RI). We utilized multiple antibody testing platforms, including lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and high throughput serological assays (HTSAs). To estimate seroprevalence, we utilized the Bayesian statistical method to adjust for sensitivity and specificity of the commercial tests used.
Results: We report than an estimated seropositive rate of RI blood donors of approximately 0.6% existed in April-May of 2020. Daily new case rates peaked in RI in late April 2020. We found HTSAs and LFAs were positively correlated with ELISA assays to detect antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 in blood donors.
Conclusions: These data imply that seroconversion, and thus infection, is likely not widespread within this population. We conclude that IgG LFAs and HTSAs are suitable to conduct seroprevalence assays in random populations. More studies will be needed using validated serological tests to improve the precision and report the kinetic progression of seroprevalence estimates.
Keywords: Antibody; COVID-19; Pandemic; Rhode Island; SARS-CoV-2; Serology; Seroprevalence.
. 2021 Aug 25;21(1):871.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06438-4.
Low Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Rhode Island blood donors during may 2020 as determined using multiple serological assay formats
Daniel J Nesbitt[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel P Jin[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joseph W Hogan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jenny Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Haidee Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Philip A Chan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Melissa J Simon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Matthew Vargas[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ewa King[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Richard C Huard[SUP] 3 5 [/SUP], Utpala Bandy[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christopher D Hillyer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Larry L Luchsinger[SUP] 6 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34433423
- DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06438-4
Abstract
Background: Epidemic projections and public health policies addressing Coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 have been implemented without data reporting on the seroconversion of the population since scalable antibody testing has only recently become available.
Methods: We measured the percentage of severe acute respiratory syndrome- Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) seropositive individuals from 2008 blood donors drawn in the state of Rhode Island (RI). We utilized multiple antibody testing platforms, including lateral flow immunoassays (LFAs), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and high throughput serological assays (HTSAs). To estimate seroprevalence, we utilized the Bayesian statistical method to adjust for sensitivity and specificity of the commercial tests used.
Results: We report than an estimated seropositive rate of RI blood donors of approximately 0.6% existed in April-May of 2020. Daily new case rates peaked in RI in late April 2020. We found HTSAs and LFAs were positively correlated with ELISA assays to detect antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 in blood donors.
Conclusions: These data imply that seroconversion, and thus infection, is likely not widespread within this population. We conclude that IgG LFAs and HTSAs are suitable to conduct seroprevalence assays in random populations. More studies will be needed using validated serological tests to improve the precision and report the kinetic progression of seroprevalence estimates.
Keywords: Antibody; COVID-19; Pandemic; Rhode Island; SARS-CoV-2; Serology; Seroprevalence.