• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Infect Dis . Validation of influenza vaccination status using health administrative databases by integrating pharmacy claims and medical billing

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis


. 2025 May 4;25(1):653.
doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11014-1. Validation of influenza vaccination status using health administrative databases by integrating pharmacy claims and medical billing databases in Ontario, Canada

Razan Amoud[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jeffrey C Kwong[SUP] 2 3 4 5 [/SUP], Colleen Maxwell[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Suzanne L Tyas[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Martin Cooke[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Alejandro Hernandez[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Wasem Alsabbagh[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Determining vaccination status among the population is key for vaccine research and surveillance. This study aimed to validate the combined use of Ontario Health Insurance Program (OHIP) physician billing claims and Ontario Drug Benefit program (ODB) pharmacist billing claims against data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS).
Methods: OHIP and ODB billing claims databases were linked to 2013-2014 CCHS data, which contain self-reported seasonal influenza vaccination status of respondents (the reference standard). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Subgroup analyses were performed based on key respondent characteristics, including having a regular medical doctor and the presence of risk factors for influenza complications.
Results: There were 31,390 eligible CCHS respondents aged ≥ 12 years in Ontario who responded to the influenza vaccination questions and agreed to have their responses linked to health administrative databases. More than half (55%) were female, 29% were aged ≥ 65 years, 93% had a regular medical doctor, and 54% had one or more risk factors for influenza complications. The sensitivity for the combined administrative databases was 60.1% (95% CI, 59.3%-61.0%), specificity was 98.5% (95% CI, 98.3%-98.7%), PPV was 96.7% (95% CI, 96.3%-97.1%), and NPV was 76.9% (95% CI, 76.4%-77.5%). Sensitivity was higher among those aged ≥ 65 years (72.7%; 95% CI, 71.6%-73.7%), with a regular medical doctor (61.1%; 95% CI, 60.3%-62.0%), and those with at least one risk factor for influenza complications (65.8%; 95% CI, 64.9%-66.8%).
Conclusion: Combining administrative physician and pharmacy claims data in Ontario results in moderate sensitivity but very high specificity and PPV, demonstrating that they can be a valid measure of influenza vaccination status.

Keywords: Administrative Health Data; Immunization; Influenza Vaccination; Pharmacist; Validation.

 
Back
Top Bottom