• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

BMC Med Educ . COVIDReady2 study protocol: cross-sectional survey of medical student volunteering and education during the COVID-19 pandemic in the

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Med Educ


. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):211.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02629-4.
COVIDReady2 study protocol: cross-sectional survey of medical student volunteering and education during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom


Matthew H V Byrne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], James Ashcroft[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Laith Alexander[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jonathan C M Wan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anmol Arora[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Megan E L Brown[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Anna Harvey[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Andrew Clelland[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nicholas Schindler[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Cecilia Brassett[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Rachel Allan[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], MedEd Collaborative



Collaborators, Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to global disruption of healthcare. Many students volunteered to provide clinical support. Volunteering to work in a clinical capacity was a unique medical education opportunity; however, it is unknown whether this was a positive learning experience or which volunteering roles were of most benefit to students.
Methods: The COVIDReady2 study is a national cross-sectional study of all medical students at medical schools in the United Kingdom. The primary outcome is to explore the experiences of medical students who volunteered during the pandemic in comparison to those who did not. We will compare responses to determine the educational benefit and issues they faced. In addition to quantitative analysis, thematic analysis will be used to identify themes in qualitative responses.
Discussion: There is a growing body of evidence to suggest that service roles have potential to enhance medical education; yet, there is a shortage of studies able to offer practical advice for how these roles may be incorporated in future medical education. We anticipate that this study will help to identify volunteer structures that have been beneficial for students, so that similar infrastructures can be used in the future, and help inform medical education in a non-pandemic setting.
Trial registration: Not Applicable.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Curriculum; Disaster medicine; Medical education; Medical school; Pandemic influenza; SARS-CoV-2; Service based learning; Volunteering.
 
Back
Top Bottom