tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open
. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e074325.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074325. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients with post-COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Jiang Yang[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Huiru Li[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hulei Zhao[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Yang Xie[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Jiansheng Li[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Minghang Wang[SUP] 4 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Objective: To assess the effects of telerehabilitation on clinical symptoms, physical function, psychological function and quality of life (QoL) in patients with post-COVID-19.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for publications from 1 January 2020 to 17 April 2024.
Eligibility criteria: RCTs investigating the effects of telerehabilitation in patients with post-COVID-19 were included. The outcomes of interest encompassed clinical symptoms, physical function, psychological function and QoL. Only studies reported in English were included.
Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager V.5.3, employing mean difference (MD) with a 95% CI, and the corresponding P value was used to ascertain the treatment effect between groups. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I[SUP]2[/SUP] statistic. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADE.
Results: 16 RCTs (n=1129) were included in this systematic review, 15 of which (n=1095, 16 comparisons) were included in the meta-analysis. The primary pooled analysis demonstrated that, compared with no rehabilitation or usual care, telerehabilitation can improve physical function (measured by 30 s sit-to-stand test [6 RCTs, n=310, MD=1.58 stands, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.66; p=0.004]; 6 min walking distance [6 RCTs, n=324, MD=76.90 m, 95% CI 49.47 to 104.33; p<0.00001]; and physical function from the 36-item short-form health survey [5 RCTs, n=380, MD=6.12 units, 95% CI 2.85 to 9.38; p=0.0002]). However, the pooled results did not indicate significant improvements in clinical symptoms, pulmonary function, psychological function or QoL. The quality of the evidence was graded as low for physical function and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety and very low for other assessed outcomes. The overall treatment completion rate was 78.26%, with no reports of severe adverse events in any included trials.
Conclusions: Despite the lack of significant improvements in certain variables, telerehabilitation could be an effective and safe option for enhancing physical function in patients with post-COVID-19. It is advisable to conduct further well-designed trials to continue in-depth exploration of this topic.
Study registration: PROSPERO, CRD42023404647.
Keywords: COVID-19; Meta-Analysis; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; Systematic Review.
. 2024 Jul 4;14(7):e074325.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074325. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients with post-COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Jiang Yang[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Huiru Li[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hulei Zhao[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Yang Xie[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Jiansheng Li[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Minghang Wang[SUP] 4 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38964791
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074325
Objective: To assess the effects of telerehabilitation on clinical symptoms, physical function, psychological function and quality of life (QoL) in patients with post-COVID-19.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Data sources: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for publications from 1 January 2020 to 17 April 2024.
Eligibility criteria: RCTs investigating the effects of telerehabilitation in patients with post-COVID-19 were included. The outcomes of interest encompassed clinical symptoms, physical function, psychological function and QoL. Only studies reported in English were included.
Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager V.5.3, employing mean difference (MD) with a 95% CI, and the corresponding P value was used to ascertain the treatment effect between groups. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I[SUP]2[/SUP] statistic. The quality of evidence was assessed by GRADE.
Results: 16 RCTs (n=1129) were included in this systematic review, 15 of which (n=1095, 16 comparisons) were included in the meta-analysis. The primary pooled analysis demonstrated that, compared with no rehabilitation or usual care, telerehabilitation can improve physical function (measured by 30 s sit-to-stand test [6 RCTs, n=310, MD=1.58 stands, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.66; p=0.004]; 6 min walking distance [6 RCTs, n=324, MD=76.90 m, 95% CI 49.47 to 104.33; p<0.00001]; and physical function from the 36-item short-form health survey [5 RCTs, n=380, MD=6.12 units, 95% CI 2.85 to 9.38; p=0.0002]). However, the pooled results did not indicate significant improvements in clinical symptoms, pulmonary function, psychological function or QoL. The quality of the evidence was graded as low for physical function and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety and very low for other assessed outcomes. The overall treatment completion rate was 78.26%, with no reports of severe adverse events in any included trials.
Conclusions: Despite the lack of significant improvements in certain variables, telerehabilitation could be an effective and safe option for enhancing physical function in patients with post-COVID-19. It is advisable to conduct further well-designed trials to continue in-depth exploration of this topic.
Study registration: PROSPERO, CRD42023404647.
Keywords: COVID-19; Meta-Analysis; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; Systematic Review.