tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open
. 2024 Jul 18;14(7):e081694.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081694. Physicians' perspectives on COVID-19 vaccinations for children: a qualitative exploration in Ontario, Canada
Kathryn Hodwitz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jannah Wigle[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Clara Juando-Prats[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kate Allan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xuedi Li[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Barbara Fallon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Catherine S Birken[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Jonathon L Maguire[SUP] 6 5 [/SUP], Janet A Parsons[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Objectives: Parents' decisions to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 are complex and often informed by discussions with primary care physicians. However, little is known about physicians' perspectives on COVID-19 vaccinations for children or their experiences counselling parents in their decision-making. We explored physicians' experiences providing COVID-19 vaccination recommendations to parents and their reflections on the contextual factors that shaped these experiences.
Design: We conducted an interpretive qualitative study using in-depth interviews. We analyzed the data using reflexive thematic analysis and a socioecological framework.
Setting: This study involved primary care practices associated with The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!) primary care research network in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada.
Participants: Participants were 10 primary care physicians, including family physicians, paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists.
Results: Participants discussed elements at the individual level (their identity, role, and knowledge), the interpersonal level (their relationships with families, responsiveness to parents' concerns, and efforts to build trust) and structural level (contextual factors related to the evolving COVID-19 climate, health system pandemic response, and constraints on care delivery) that influenced their experiences providing recommendations to parents. Our findings illustrated that physicians' interactions with families were shaped by a confluence of their own perspectives, their responses to parents' perspectives, and the evolving landscape of the broader pandemic.
Conclusions: Our study underscores the social and relational nature of vaccination decision-making and highlights the multiple influences on primary care physicians' experiences providing COVID-19 vaccination recommendations to parents. Our findings offer suggestions for future COVID-19 vaccination programmes for children. Delivery of new COVID-19 vaccinations for children may be well suited within primary care offices, where trusting relationships are established, but physicians need support in staying knowledgeable about emerging information, communicating available evidence to parents to inform their decision-making and dedicating time for vaccination counselling.
Keywords: COVID-19; PUBLIC HEALTH; Physicians; Primary Care; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Vaccination.
. 2024 Jul 18;14(7):e081694.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081694. Physicians' perspectives on COVID-19 vaccinations for children: a qualitative exploration in Ontario, Canada
Kathryn Hodwitz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jannah Wigle[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Clara Juando-Prats[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kate Allan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xuedi Li[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Barbara Fallon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Catherine S Birken[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Jonathon L Maguire[SUP] 6 5 [/SUP], Janet A Parsons[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39025822
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081694
Objectives: Parents' decisions to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 are complex and often informed by discussions with primary care physicians. However, little is known about physicians' perspectives on COVID-19 vaccinations for children or their experiences counselling parents in their decision-making. We explored physicians' experiences providing COVID-19 vaccination recommendations to parents and their reflections on the contextual factors that shaped these experiences.
Design: We conducted an interpretive qualitative study using in-depth interviews. We analyzed the data using reflexive thematic analysis and a socioecological framework.
Setting: This study involved primary care practices associated with The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!) primary care research network in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada.
Participants: Participants were 10 primary care physicians, including family physicians, paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists.
Results: Participants discussed elements at the individual level (their identity, role, and knowledge), the interpersonal level (their relationships with families, responsiveness to parents' concerns, and efforts to build trust) and structural level (contextual factors related to the evolving COVID-19 climate, health system pandemic response, and constraints on care delivery) that influenced their experiences providing recommendations to parents. Our findings illustrated that physicians' interactions with families were shaped by a confluence of their own perspectives, their responses to parents' perspectives, and the evolving landscape of the broader pandemic.
Conclusions: Our study underscores the social and relational nature of vaccination decision-making and highlights the multiple influences on primary care physicians' experiences providing COVID-19 vaccination recommendations to parents. Our findings offer suggestions for future COVID-19 vaccination programmes for children. Delivery of new COVID-19 vaccinations for children may be well suited within primary care offices, where trusting relationships are established, but physicians need support in staying knowledgeable about emerging information, communicating available evidence to parents to inform their decision-making and dedicating time for vaccination counselling.
Keywords: COVID-19; PUBLIC HEALTH; Physicians; Primary Care; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Vaccination.