• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Building-level analyses to prospectively detect influenza outbreaks in long-term care facilities: New York City, 2013-2014

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Infect Control. 2015 May 8. pii: S0196-6553(15)00225-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.03.037. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Building-level analyses to prospectively detect influenza outbreaks in long-term care facilities: New York City, 2013-2014.[/h] Levin-Rector A[SUP]1[/SUP], Nivin B[SUP]2[/SUP], Yeung A[SUP]2[/SUP], Fine AD[SUP]2[/SUP], Greene SK[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Timely outbreak detection is necessary to successfully control influenza in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and other institutions. To supplement nosocomial outbreak reports, calls from infection control staff, and active laboratory surveillance, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene implemented an automated building-level analysis to proactively identify LTCFs with laboratory-confirmed influenza activity.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Geocoded addresses of LTCFs in NYC were compared with geocoded residential addresses for all case-patients with laboratory-confirmed influenza reported through passive surveillance. An automated daily analysis used the geocoded building identification number, approximate text matching, and key-word searches to identify influenza in residents of LTCFs for review and follow-up by surveillance coordinators. Our aim was to determine whether the building analysis improved prospective outbreak detection during the 2013-2014 influenza season.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Of 119 outbreaks identified in LTCFs, 109 (92%) were ever detected by the building analysis, and 55 (46%) were first detected by the building analysis. Of the 5,953 LTCF staff and residents who received antiviral prophylaxis during the 2013-2014 season, 929 (16%) were at LTCFs where outbreaks were initially detected by the building analysis.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] A novel building-level analysis improved influenza outbreak identification in LTCFs in NYC, prompting timely infection control measures.
Copyright ? 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Automated analysis; Disease cluster detection; Geocoding; Nosocomial outbreaks; Outbreak management; Surveillance

PMID: 25960384 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom