• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Can Commun Dis Rep . Serum antibody response in COVID-19-recovered patients who retested positive

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Can Commun Dis Rep


. 2021 May 7;47(4):195-201.
doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v47i04a03.
Serum antibody response in COVID-19-recovered patients who retested positive


Nicole Atchessi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Megan Striha[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rojiemiahd Edjoc[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Christine Abalos[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Amanda Lien[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lisa Waddell[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Imran Gabrani-Juma[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emily Thompson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Thomas Dawson[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Research studies comparing antibody response from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases that retested positive (RP) using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and those who did not retest positive (NRP) were used to investigate a possible relationship between antibody response and retesting status.
Methods: Seven data bases were searched. Research criteria included cohort and case-control studies, carried out worldwide and published before September 9, 2020, that compared the serum antibody levels of hospitalized COVID-19 cases that RP after discharge to those that did NRP.
Results: There is some evidence that immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody levels in RP cases were lower compared with NRP cases. The hypothesis of incomplete clearance aligns with these findings. The possibility of false negative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR test results during viral clearance is also plausible, as concentration of the viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) in nasopharyngeal and fecal swabs fluctuate below the limits of RT-PCR detection during virus clearance. The probability of reinfection was less likely to be the cause of retesting positive because of the low risk of exposure where cases observed a 14 day-quarantine after discharge.
Conclusion: More studies are needed to better explain the immune response of recovered COVID-19 cases retesting positive after discharge.

Keywords: COVID-19; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; false-negative; reinfection; retesting.
 
Back
Top Bottom