Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H1N1
Russian flu
<dl><dd>See Influenza A virus subtype H2N2#Russian flu for the 1889–1890 Russian flu</dd></dl> The more recent Russian flu was a 1977–1978 flu epidemic caused by strain Influenza A/USSR/90/77 (H1N1). It infected mostly children and young adults under 23 because a similar strain was prevalent in 1947–57, causing most adults to have substantial immunity. Some have called it a flu pandemic but because it only affected the young it is not considered a true pandemic. The virus was included in the 1978–1979 influenza vaccine.<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-9">[10]</sup><sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-10">[11]</sup><sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-11">[12]</sup><sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-12">[13]</sup>
The suggestion is clear: the virus was frozen in a laboratory freezer since 1950, and was released, either by intent or accident, in 1977. This possibility has been denied by Chinese and Russian scientists, but remains to this day the only scientifically plausible explanation.
From October 2004 to February 2005, approximately 3,700 test kits of the 1957 H2N2 virus were accidentally spread around the world from the College of American Pathologists (CAP). CAP assists laboratories in accuracy by providing unidentified samples of viruses; private contractor Meridian Bioscience in Cincinnati, U.S., chose the 1957 strand instead of one of the less deadly avian influenza virus subtypes. "CAP spokesman Dr. Jared Schwartz said Meridian knew what the virus was but believed it was safe. In selecting it, the company had determined that the virus was classified as a biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) agent, which meant it could legally be used in the kits. [...] Before the problem came to light, the CDC had made a recommendation that the H2N2 virus be reclassified as a BSL-3 agent, Gerberding said. She promised to speed up the reclassification. The CDC determines the classifications in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health. In BSL-3 labs, agents are handled with equipment designed to prevent any airborne contamination and resulting respiratory exposure."[10] The 1957 H2N2 virus is considered deadly and the U.S. government called for the vials containing the strain to be destroyed.
"CDC officials reported on 21 April that 99% of the samples had already been destroyed. News reports on 25 April said the last samples outside the United States had been destroyed at the American University of Beirut in Lebanon, after they were found at the Beirut airport. Earlier reports said H2N2 samples were sent to 3,747 labs under CAP auspices and to about another 2,700 labs certified by other organizations. All but about 75 labs that received the CAP samples were in the United States."[11]
"In the United States, there is no government regulation over the 1957 flu strain. In fact, federal officials at the CDC do not even know how many U.S. laboratories keep this deadly strain in their viral libraries."[12]
Surely the probability of reassortment between H5N1 and a human flu, in a given time period, is proportional to the number of individuals infected with a human flu in that time period, and proportional to the number of individuals infected with H5N1 in that time period. The former number may well be in the process of increasing dramatically: whether you think worldwide or just in H5N1-infested environments, the number of individuals (human and pig) infected with human flu will be much larger over the coming year or two than over the past year or two. Therefore it seems reasonable to me to think that the probability of such a reassortment is indeed increasing - unless, for reasons we don't understand, it was exactly 0 before, in which case it's still 0. We can hope.the chances for human+H5 reassortment have not increased
by the emergence of the new novel H1N1
I can't see why the new virus should be more potent to reassort with H5N1
It may kill old H1N1 and H3N2 in the next years
58 >A/Bar-h Gs/Qinghai/62/05(H5N1)
10:153,144,110,359,170,148, 87,158 A/swine-flu/index/2009-02-01(H1N1)
26:158,133, 95,404,174,212,134,147 A/Wisconsin/10/98(H1N1)
38:152,170,147,353,142,171,111,123 A/swine/1931(H1N1)
40:153,158,139,358,136,173, 94, 89 A/Brevig Mission/1/1918(H1N1)
47:176,182,165,373,167,218,121,139 A/Kansas/UR06-0068/2007(H1N1)
49:170,138,167,496,189,491,125,135 A/Texas/UR06-0356/2007(H3N2)
it's not only the number of infected persons, it's also the diversity
of the involved viruses. Diversity in swineflu is currently small.