• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cell culture-based production of defective interfering particles for influenza antiviral therapy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Dec 5. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8660-3. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Cell culture-based production of defective interfering particles for influenza antiviral therapy.[/h] Wasik MA[SUP]1[/SUP], Eichwald L[SUP]2[/SUP], Genzel Y[SUP]2[/SUP], Reichl U[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Defective interfering particles (DIPs) lack an essential portion of the virus genome, but retain signals for replication and packaging, and therefore, interfere with standard virus (STV) replication. Due to this property, DIPs can be potential antivirals. The influenza A virus DIP DI244, generated during propagation in chicken eggs, has been previously described as a potential candidate for influenza antiviral therapy. As a cell culture-based manufacturing process would be more suitable to fulfill large-scale production needs of an antiviral and enables full process control in closed systems, we investigated options to produce DI244 in the avian cell line AGE1.CR.pIX in chemically defined suspension culture. With a DI244 fraction of 55.8% compared to STV, the highest DI244 yield obtained from 50 million cells was 4.6 ? 10[SUP]9[/SUP] vRNA copies/mL at 12 h post infection. However, other defective genomes were also detected. Since these additionally produced defective particles are non-infectious, they might be still useful in antiviral therapies. In case they would interfere with quality of the final product, we examined the impact of virus seeds and selected process parameters on DI244 yield and contamination level with other defective particles. With a DI244 fraction of 5.5%, the yield obtained was 1.7 ? 10[SUP]8[/SUP] vRNA copies/mL but now without additional defective genomes. Although the DI244 yield might be decreased in this case, such controlled manufacturing conditions are not available in chicken eggs. Overall, the application of these findings can support design and optimization of a cell culture-based production process for DIPs to be used as antivirals.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Cell culture; DI244 antiviral; Defective interfering particles; Influenza A virus; Suspension cell line

PMID: 29204901 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-017-8660-3
 
Back
Top Bottom