• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP: Some details emerge on coronavirus cases, but many gaps remain

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/other/sars/news/sep2612corona.html


Some details emerge on coronavirus cases, but many gaps remain

Sep 26, 2012 (CIDRAP News) ? A European report has filled in some details about the two severe illnesses linked to a novel coronavirus, but most of the major questions, such as where it came from and how it spreads, remained unanswered today.

A 49-year-old Qatari man remained in a London hospital's intensive care unit with a severe respiratory illness accompanied by renal failure. A 60-year-old Saudi Arabian man who had a similar illness and was infected with a virtually identical coronavirus died in June in his home country. No new confirmed or suspected cases were reported today.

A risk assessment released by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) offered some new details on the cases, including that the Qatari patient had returned from a trip to Saudi Arabia more than 10 days before he fell ill on Sep 3, which seems to suggest that he wasn't infected while in that country.

A case definition released by the World Health Organization (WHO) yesterday lists a history of travel to Saudi Arabia within 7 days before illness onset, or close contact with a probable or confirmed case-patient in that same time frame, as a possible clue to the virus in a person who is hospitalized with an acute respiratory infection accompanied by fever and cough.

A Sep 25 letter from the head of the United Kingdom Department of Health to UK health workers said the incubation period for the new virus is assumed to be 7 days, given what is known about other human coronavirus infections. The letter to UK National Health Service workers was written by Dame Sally C. Davies, chief medical officer.

A then-novel coronavirus sparked the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) outbreak in 2003, which involved more than 8,422 cases globally and killed 916 people, according to the ECDC risk assessment. Aside from the outbreak, human coronaviruses are mainly known for causing colds. Health officials have stressed that the new coronavirus is clearly different from the SARS virus.

Both the Davies letter and the ECDC risk assessment said no suspected cases have been found among contacts of the Qatari patient or elsewhere. "Many of these contacts are already likely to be beyond the incubation period . . . when symptoms would have developed had they been infected," Davies wrote.

The ECDC said that as of yesterday it was not aware of "any increase in the number of patients with acute respiratory infections of unknown cause in intensive care units in Saudi Arabia or Qatar."

The ECDC statement filled in some new details on the 60-year-old Saudi Arabian who died. It said he fell ill on Jun 6, was hospitalized with severe pneumonia on Jun 13, and died on Jun 24.

The fact that the two cases occurred 3 months apart and that time spent in Saudi Arabia is the only known link means that "independent non?human-to-human transmission must be considered" and that an animal source can't be excluded, the ECDC said.

In addition, it is likely that the novel virus caused both cases, but more evidence is needed to prove this, the agency said. It added, "It is not clear which laboratory tests are most applicable for detection of the novel coronavirus, and there is therefore an urgent need to validate the existing tests and to develop more specific ones."

Meanwhile, the UK Health Protection Agency (HPA) said today that the WHO "has convened relevant European laboratories to work collaboratively to produce clinically validated assays for real-time detection of the novel coronavirus." The HPA also said that Ron Fouchier, PhD, of Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, is expected publish the full genome of the virus from the Saudi Arabian man within a day or two.

In other developments, the Hong Kong Centre for Health Protection (CHP) published some guidance related to the new coronavirus, including advice to schools and recommendations on personal protective equipment for helathcare personnel. Hong Kong served as the launching pad for the international spread of the SARS virus in 2003, after it emerged in mainland China in late 2002.

See also:

ECDC risk assessment

Sep 25 Davies letter to NHS staff

Sep 26 UK HPA statement about development of molecular diagnostics for new virus

Hong Kong CHP guidance for schools and recommendations for healthcare workers
 
Back
Top Bottom