• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes . Relative Effectiveness of High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults with Cardiovasc

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes


. 2024 Aug 31.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011496. Online ahead of print. Relative Effectiveness of High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Prespecified Analysis of the DANFLU-1 Randomized Clinical Trial

Jacob Christensen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kira Hyldekaer Janstrup[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joshua Nealon[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sandrine I Samson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Rebecca Harris[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Carsten Schade Larsen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Anne Marie Reimer Jensen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nino E Landler[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brian L Claggett[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Gunnar H Gislason[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lars Køber[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Martin J Landray[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Pradeesh Sivapalan[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 12 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Influenza vaccination reduces the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We sought to evaluate whether the presence of CVD modified the relative effectiveness of high-dose (QIV-HD) vs. standard-dose (QIV-SD) quadrivalent influenza vaccine in this prespecified analysis of the DANFLU-1 trial. Methods: DANFLU-1 was a pragmatic, open-label, randomized feasibility trial of QIV-HD vs. QIV-SD in adults aged 65-79 years during the 2021/2022 influenza season in Denmark. Vaccines were allocated in a 1:1 ratio. Baseline and follow-up data regarding diagnoses and mortality were obtained from Danish national registers. The trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05048589. The CVDs assessed included heart failure (HF), ischemic heart disease (IHD), atrial fibrillation, and a combined group denoted "chronic CVD" consisting of the aforementioned diseases, among others. Prespecified outcomes included hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza, respiratory disease, CVD, cardiorespiratory disease, all-cause hospitalizations, and mortality. Effect modification was tested using interaction terms. Results: The final study population included 12,477 participants (mean age 71.7±3.9 years, 5,877 (47.1%) female), of whom 2,540 (20.4%) had chronic CVD. QIV-HD vs. QIV-SD was associated with a lower incidence of hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza (IRR 0.30 (95%-CI 0.14-0.64)) and all-cause mortality (IRR 0.51 (0.30-0.86)) regardless of chronic CVD (p for interaction=0.57 and 0.49, respectively). The relative effectiveness of QIV-HD vs. QIV-SD against all-cause hospitalizations was modified in participants with chronic CVD (Overall: IRR 0.87 (0.76-0.99); no chronic CVD: 0.79 (0.67-0.92); chronic CVD: 1.11 (0.88-1.39); p for interaction=0.026). No other effect modification was observed by the presence of chronic CVD, HF, IHD, or atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: The relative effectiveness of QIV-HD vs. QIV-SD was consistent against hospitalizations for pneumonia or influenza and all-cause mortality regardless of chronic CVD. However, the relative effectiveness against all-cause hospitalizations was modified by the presence of chronic CVD. These results should be considered hypothesis-generating.


 
Back
Top Bottom