• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Chem Lab Med . Evaluation of a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay pl

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Chem Lab Med


. 2023 Jan 19.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1039. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay platform


Minghang Yu[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Danying Chen[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Xiaomeng Tang[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yuanyuan Zhang[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Pu Liang[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Yang Xiong[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Rui Li[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Rui Song[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xiaoyou Chen[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xuesen Zhao[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Xi Wang[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Ronghua Jin[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: To describe a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test that is based on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay (LiCA[SUP]®[/SUP]), and to validate its analytical characteristics and clinical agreement on detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection against the reference molecular test.
Methods: Analytical performance was validated and detection limits were determined using different types of nucleocapsid protein samples. 798-pair anterior nasal swab specimens were collected from hospitalized patients and asymptomatic screening individuals. Agreement between LiCA[SUP]®[/SUP] antigen and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was evaluated.
Results: Repeatability and within-lab precision were 1.6-2.3%. The C[SUB]5[/SUB]∼C[SUB]95[/SUB] interval was -5.1-4.6% away from C[SUB]50[/SUB]. Detection limits in average (SD) were 325 (±141) U/mL on the national reference panel, 0.07 (±0.04) TCID[SUB]50[/SUB]/mL on active viral cultures, 0.27 (±0.09) pg/mL on recombinant nucleocapsid proteins and 1.07 (±1.01) TCID[SUB]50[/SUB]/mL on inactivated viral suspensions, respectively. LiCA detected a median of 374-fold (IQR 137-643) lower levels of the viral antigen than comparative rapid tests. As reference to the rRT-PCR method, overall sensitivity and specificity were determined to be 97.5% (91.4-99.7%) and 99.9% (99.2-100%), respectively. Total agreement between both methods was 99.6% (98.7-99.9%) with Cohen's kappa 0.98 (0.96-1). A positive detection rate of 100% (95.4-100%) was obtained as Ct≤37.8.
Conclusions: The LiCA[SUP]®[/SUP] system provides an exceptionally high-sensitivity and fully automated platform for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasal swabs. The assay may have high potential use for large-scale population screening and surveillance of COVID-19 as an alternative to the rRT-PCR test.

Keywords: LiCA®; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus disease 2019; high-sensitivity; light-initiated chemiluminescent assay; rRT-PCR.
 
Back
Top Bottom