• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Chem Lab Med . Patients with severe COVID-19 do not have elevated autoantibodies against common diagnostic autoantigens

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Chem Lab Med


. 2022 Apr 28.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0239. Online ahead of print.
Patients with severe COVID-19 do not have elevated autoantibodies against common diagnostic autoantigens


Antigona Ulndreaj[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mingyue Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Salvia Misaghian[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Louis Paone[SUP] 2 [/SUP], George B Sigal[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Martin Stengelin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christopher Campbell[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Logan R Van Nynatten[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Antoninus Soosaipillai[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Atefeh Ghorbani[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Anu Mathew[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Douglas D Fraser[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Eleftherios P Diamandis[SUP] 1 5 6 7 [/SUP], Ioannis Prassas[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: Infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative pathogen of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents occasionally with an aberrant autoinflammatory response, including the presence of elevated circulating autoantibodies in some individuals. Whether the development of autoantibodies against self-antigens affects COVID-19 outcomes remains unclear. To better understand the prognostic role of autoantibodies in COVID-19, we quantified autoantibodies against 23 markers that are used for diagnosis of autoimmune disease. To this end, we used serum samples from patients with severe [intensive care unit (ICU)] and moderate (ward) COVID-19, across two to six consecutive time points, and compared autoantibody levels to uninfected healthy and ICU controls.
Methods: Acute and post-acute serum (from 1 to 26 ICU days) was collected from 18 ICU COVID-19-positive patients at three to six time points; 18 ICU COVID-19-negative patients (sampled on ICU day 1 and 3); 21 ward COVID-19-positive patients (sampled on hospital day 1 and 3); and from 59 healthy uninfected controls deriving from two cohorts. Levels of IgG autoantibodies against 23 autoantigens, commonly used for autoimmune disease diagnosis, were measured in serum samples using MSD[SUP]®[/SUP] U-PLEX electrochemiluminescence technology (MSD division Meso Scale Discovery[SUP]®[/SUP]), and results were compared between groups.
Results: There were no significant elevations of autoantibodies for any of the markers tested in patients with severe COVID-19.
Conclusions: Sample collections at longer time points should be considered in future studies, for assessing the possible development of autoantibody responses following infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: COVID-19; Intensive care unit (ICU); SARS-CoV-2; autoantibodies; autoimmunity; electrochemiluminescence; prognostic markers; severe disease.
 
Back
Top Bottom