• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Epigenetics . The response to influenza vaccination is associated with DNA methylation-driven regulation of T cell innate antiviral pathways

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Epigenetics


. 2024 Aug 21;16(1):114.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-024-01730-x. The response to influenza vaccination is associated with DNA methylation-driven regulation of T cell innate antiviral pathways

Hongxiang Fu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Harry Pickering[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Liudmilla Rubbi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ted M Ross[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Wanding Zhou[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Elaine F Reed[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Matteo Pellegrini[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The effect of vaccination on the epigenome remains poorly characterized. In previous research, we identified an association between seroprotection against influenza and DNA methylation at sites associated with the RIG-1 signaling pathway, which recognizes viral double-stranded RNA and leads to a type I interferon response. However, these studies did not fully account for confounding factors including age, gender, and BMI, along with changes in cell-type composition.
Results: Here, we studied the influenza vaccine response in a longitudinal cohort vaccinated over two consecutive years (2019-2020 and 2020-2021), using peripheral blood mononuclear cells and a targeted DNA methylation approach. To address the effects of multiple factors on the epigenome, we designed a multivariate multiple regression model that included seroprotection levels as quantified by the hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) assay test.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that 179 methylation sites can be combined as potential signatures to predict seroprotection. These sites were not only enriched for genes involved in the regulation of the RIG-I signaling pathway, as found previously, but also enriched for other genes associated with innate immunity to viruses and the transcription factor binding sites of BRD4, which is known to impact T cell memory. We propose a model to suggest that the RIG-I pathway and BRD4 could potentially be modulated to improve immunization strategies.

Keywords: Cell-type deconvolution; DNA methylation; Influenza vaccine; Influenza virus; RNA sequencing; Targeted bisulfite sequencing.

 
Back
Top Bottom