• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Immunol . The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 as a recall response susceptible to immune imprinting: A prospective cohort study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Immunol


. 2025 Jan 20:110429.
doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2025.110429. Online ahead of print. The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 as a recall response susceptible to immune imprinting: A prospective cohort study

Daniel Alvarez-Sierra[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mónica Martínez-Gallo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Marco Fernández-Sanmartín[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Roger Colobran[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Juan Espinosa-Pereiro[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Elísabet Poyatos-Canton[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Coral Zurera-Egea[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Alex Sánchez-Pla[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Concepción Violan[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Rafael Parra[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Hammad Alzayat[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ana Vivancos[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Francisco Morandeira-Rego[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Blanca Urban-Vargas[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Eva Martínez-Cáceres[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Manuel Hernández-González[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jordi Bas-Minguet[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Peter D Katsikis[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Aina Teniente-Serra[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Ricardo Pujol-Borrell[SUP] 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 does not follow the immunoglobulin isotype pattern of primary responses, conflicting with the current interpretation of COVID-19.
Methods: Prospective cohort study of 191 SARS-CoV-2 infection cases and 44 controls from the second wave of COVID-19. The study stratified patients by severity and analyzed the trajectories of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and multiple immune variables.
Results: Isotype-specific antibody time course profiles to SARS-CoV-2 revealed a pattern of recall response in 94.2 % of cases. The time course profiles of plasmablasts, B cells, cTfh high-resolution subsets, and cytokines indicated a secondary response. The transcriptomic data showed that this cohort is strictly comparable to contemporary cohorts.
Conclusions: In most cases, the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is a recall response. This constitutes a favorable scenario for most COVID-19 cases to be subjected to immune imprinting by endemic coronavirus, which, in turn, can influence the immune response to SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: Antibody-dependent-enhancement; COVID-19; Immune imprinting; Original antigenic sin; Plasmablast; SARS-CoV-2; Spectral flow cytometry; cTfh.

 
Back
Top Bottom