• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . Electronic Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccination in Immunosuppressed Adults Across the Age Spectrum: A Pooled Analysis of Two N

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2026 Apr 12:ciag219.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciag219. Online ahead of print.
Electronic Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccination in Immunosuppressed Adults Across the Age Spectrum: A Pooled Analysis of Two Nationwide Randomized Trials

Anne Marie Reimer Jensen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Peter Suldrup Wolff[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Muthiah Vaduganathan[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Ankeet S Bhatt[SUP] 4 5 6 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Lisa Steen Duus[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Safia Chatur[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Brian L Claggett[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kira Hyldekær Janstrup[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Joshua A Hill[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Harriette G C Van Spall[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Carsten Schade Larsen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Lykke Larsen[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Lothar Wiese[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Michael Dalager-Pedersen[SUP] 12 13 [/SUP], Lars Køber[SUP] 14 15 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pradeesh Sivapalan[SUP] 14 16 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 14 16 [/SUP], Cyril Jean-Marie Martel[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Tyra Grove Krause[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 1 2 15 18 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Immunosuppressed individuals face higher risk of severe influenza complications, yet vaccination coverage remains low. We aimed to assess the effect of electronic letter-based nudges on influenza vaccination uptake by immunosuppression status.
Methods: We performed a participant-level pooled analysis of two methodologically harmonized, nationwide, pragmatic randomized clinical trials (NUDGE-FLU-2 and NUDGE-FLU-CHRONIC) conducted during the 2023-2024 influenza season. Adults aged ≥65 years (NUDGE-FLU-2) and adults aged 18-64 years with chronic conditions (NUDGE-FLU-CHRONIC) were included, with immunosuppression defined by an immunosuppressive diagnosis or a filled prescription for immunosuppressive therapy. Participants were randomized in a 2.45:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to usual care or one of six electronic letter interventions. The primary outcome was receipt of influenza vaccination by January 1, 2024, ascertained from nationwide administrative health registries. Effect modification by immunosuppression status was assessed using binomial regression.
Results: Among 1,181,254 participants (mean age 67 years; 73,830 [6.3%] immunosuppressed), 66.1% were vaccinated. Any letter increased vaccine uptake compared with usual care (absolute difference, 2.79 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.60-2.98; p<0.001), with greater effect among immunosuppressed individuals (+4.12 vs +2.70 percentage points; pinteraction=0.002). In younger adults with chronic conditions, letter-based nudges increased vaccination rates by 11.7 percentage points overall and by 13.3 percentage points among those with immunosuppression (pinteraction=0.007). Among immunosuppressed individuals, nudging effects appeared greater for those with immunosuppressive conditions than for those receiving immunosuppressive treatment.
Conclusions: Electronic letter-based nudges increased influenza vaccination rates, with greater benefit among individuals with immunosuppression. These findings support implementation of low-cost, letter-based nudging strategies to improve vaccine uptake in this high-risk population.

Keywords: behavioral nudges; digital health communication; immunosuppression; influenza; influenza vaccination; pragmatic randomized trials; vaccine uptake.

 
Back
Top Bottom