• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . Saliva is not a useful diagnostic specimen in children with Coronavirus Disease 2019

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2020 Sep 14;ciaa1376.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1376. Online ahead of print.
Saliva is not a useful diagnostic specimen in children with Coronavirus Disease 2019


Chia Yin Chong[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Kai-Qian Kam[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Jiahui Li[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Matthias Maiwald[SUP] 5 3 6 [/SUP], Liat Hui Loo[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Karen Donceras Nadua[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Natalie Woon Hui Tan[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Chee Fu Yung[SUP] 1 3 4 [/SUP], Koh Cheng Thoon[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

No abstract available
 
The title is a little alarming but this is a single site with only 18 patients included and the PCR picked up infection from both swab types although NP gave lower CT values. NP is not suitable for voluntary mass testing of children as once they have had a swab rammed up to just short of their brain they will not want to come back a second time so nasal or saliva is still the more practical option.
 
Back
Top Bottom