• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . Symptoms, viral loads, and rebound among COVID-19 outpatients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared to propensity score mat

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2023 Nov 14:ciad696.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad696. Online ahead of print. Symptoms, viral loads, and rebound among COVID-19 outpatients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir compared to propensity score matched untreated individuals

Sarah E Smith-Jeffcoat[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jessica E Biddle[SUP] 2 [/SUP], H Keipp Talbot[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kerry Grace Morrisey[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Melissa S Stockwell[SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP], Yvonne Maldonado[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Huong Q McLean[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Katherine D Ellingson[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Natalie M Bowman[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Edwin Asturias[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Alexandra M Mellis[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sheroi Johnson[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hannah L Kirking[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Melissa A R Rolfes[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vanessa Olivo[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Lori Merrill[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Steph Battan-Wraith[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ellen Sano[SUP] 7 13 [/SUP], Son H McLaren[SUP] 7 13 [/SUP], Celibell Y Vargas[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sara Goodman[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Clea C Sarnquist[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Prasanthi Govindaranjan[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Joshua G Petrie[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Edward A Belongia[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Karla Ledezma[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Kathleen Pryor[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Karen Lutrick[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Ayla Bullock[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Amy Yang[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Quenla Haehnel[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Suchitra Rao[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Yuwei Zhu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jonathan Schmitz[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kimberly Hart[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carlos G Grijalva[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Phillip P Salvatore[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N/R) reduces severe outcomes among patients with COVID-19; however, rebound after treatment has been reported. We compared symptom and viral dynamics in community-based individuals with COVID-19 who completed N/R and similar untreated individuals.
Methods: We identified symptomatic participants who tested SARS-CoV-2 positive and were N/R eligible from a COVID-19 household transmission study: index cases from ambulatory settings and their households were enrolled, collecting daily symptoms, medication use, and respiratory specimens for quantitative PCR for 10 days, March 2022-May 2023. Participants who completed N/R (treated) were propensity score matched to untreated participants. We compared symptom rebound, viral load (VL) rebound, average daily symptoms, and average daily VL by treatment status measured after N/R completion or, if untreated, seven days after symptom onset.
Results: Treated (n=130) and untreated participants (n=241) had similar baseline characteristics. After treatment completion, treated participants had greater occurrence of symptom rebound (32% vs 20%; p=0.009) and VL rebound (27% vs 7%; p<0.001). Average daily symptoms were lower among treated participants compared to untreated participants without symptom rebound (1.0 vs 1.6; p<0.01), but not statistically lower with symptom rebound (3.0 vs 3.4; p=0.5). Treated participants had lower average daily VLs without VL rebound (0.9 vs 2.6; p<0.01), but not statistically lower with VL rebound (4.8 vs 5.1; p=0.7).
Conclusions: Individuals who completed N/R experienced fewer symptoms and lower VL but were more likely to have rebound compared to untreated individuals. Providers should still prescribe N/R, when indicated, and communicate possible increased rebound risk to patients.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antiviral treatment; rebound; symptoms; viral loads.

 
Back
Top Bottom