• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Kidney J . Outcomes of patients with COVID-19 on kidney replacement therapy: a comparison among modalities in England

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Kidney J


. 2021 Sep 4;14(12):2573-2581.
doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab160. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Outcomes of patients with COVID-19 on kidney replacement therapy: a comparison among modalities in England


Manuela Savino[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shalini Santhakumaran[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katharine M Evans[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Retha Steenkamp[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fran Benoy-Deeney[SUP] 1 [/SUP], James F Medcalf[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dorothea Nitsch[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease is a recognized risk factor of poor outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the UK Renal Registry database of people on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) at the end of 2019 in England and who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) between 1 March 2020 and 31 August 2020 to analyse the incidence and outcomes of COVID-19 among different KRT modalities. Comparisons with 2015-2019 mortality data were used to estimate excess deaths.
Results: A total of 2783 individuals on KRT tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Patients from more-deprived areas {most deprived versus least deprived hazard ratio
1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.39]} and those with diabetes compared with those without [HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.39-1.64)] were more likely to test positive. Approximately 25% of in-centre haemodialysis and transplanted patients died within 28 days of testing positive compared with 36% of those on home therapies. Mortality was higher in those ≥80 years of age compared with those 60-79 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.71 (95% CI 1.34-2.19)] and much lower in those listed for transplantation compared with those not listed [OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.40-0.80)]. Overall, excess mortality in 2020 for people on KRT was 36% higher than the 2015-2019 average. Excess deaths peaked in April 2020 at the height of the pandemic and were characterized by wide ethnic and regional disparities.
Conclusions: The impact of COVID-19 on the English KRT population highlights their extreme vulnerability and emphasizes the need to protect and prioritize this group for vaccination. COVID-19 has widened underlying inequalities in people with kidney disease, making interventions that address health inequalities a priority.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; dialysis; kidney replacement therapy; transplant.
 
Back
Top Bottom