• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CMAJ . Active testing of groups at increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 in Canada: costs and human resource needs

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
CMAJ


. 2020 Sep 9;cmaj.201128.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201128. Online ahead of print.
Active testing of groups at increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 in Canada: costs and human resource needs


Jonathon R Campbell[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aashna Uppal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Olivia Oxlade[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Federica Fregonese[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mayara Lisboa Bastos[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhiyi Lan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephanie Law[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chi Eun Oh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], W Alton Russell[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Giorgia Sulis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicholas Winters[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mercedes Yanes-Lane[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marc Brisson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sonia Laszlo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Timothy G Evans[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dick Menzies[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is largely passive, which impedes epidemic control. We defined active testing strategies for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for groups at increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 in all Canadian provinces.
Methods: We identified 5 groups who should be prioritized for active RT-PCR testing: contacts of people who are positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 4 at-risk populations - hospital employees, community health care workers and people in long-term care facilities, essential business employees, and schoolchildren and staff. We estimated costs, human resources and laboratory capacity required to test people in each group or to perform surveillance testing in random samples.
Results: During July 8-17, 2020, across all provinces in Canada, an average of 41 751 RT-PCR tests were performed daily; we estimated this required 5122 personnel and cost $2.4 million per day ($67.8 million per month). Systematic contact tracing and testing would increase personnel needs 1.2-fold and monthly costs to $78.9 million. Conducted over a month, testing all hospital employees would require 1823 additional personnel, costing $29.0 million; testing all community health care workers and persons in long-term care facilities would require 11 074 additional personnel and cost $124.8 million; and testing all essential employees would cost $321.7 million, requiring 25 965 added personnel. Testing the larger population within schools over 6 weeks would require 46 368 added personnel and cost $816.0 million. Interventions addressing inefficiencies, including saliva-based sampling and pooling samples, could reduce costs by 40% and personnel by 20%. Surveillance testing in population samples other than contacts would cost 5% of the cost of a universal approach to testing at-risk populations.
Interpretation: Active testing of groups at increased risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 appears feasible and would support the safe reopening of the economy and schools more broadly. This strategy also appears affordable compared with the $169.2 billion committed by the federal government as a response to the pandemic as of June 2020.
 
Back
Top Bottom