• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparative evaluation of the CerTest VIASURE flu A, B & RSV real time RT-PCR detection kit on the BD MAX system versus a routine in-house assay for d

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol. 2017 Dec 21;99-100:35-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.12.010. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Comparative evaluation of the CerTest VIASURE flu A, B & RSV real time RT-PCR detection kit on the BD MAX system versus a routine in-house assay for detection of influenza A and B virus during the 2016/17 influenza season.[/h] Sydenham TV[SUP]1[/SUP], Bek-Thomsen M[SUP]2[/SUP], Andersen SD[SUP]3[/SUP], Kolmos B[SUP]4[/SUP], Marmolin ES[SUP]5[/SUP], Trebbien R[SUP]6[/SUP], M?ller JK[SUP]7[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Diagnosing of influenza rapidly and accurately helps clinicians to initiate appropriate treatment options and isolation protocols. Unnecessary antimicrobial treatment and laboratory testing can also be reduced. Assess commercial alternatives to in-house assays that may not only reduce laboratory technician "hands on" time but also the laboratory turnaround time is of interest.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] We evaluated the performance of the VIASURE Flu A, B & RSV Real Time RT-PCR Detection Kit (CerTest Biotec) for detecting Influenza A and B viruses.
[h=4]STUDY DESIGN:[/h] During the 2016/17 influenza season 532 clinical samples were tested with the VIASURE assay on the BD MAX? system versus an in-house real time RT-PCR assay with discrepant results resolved by a real time RT-PCR assay at a national reference laboratory.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The VIASURE assay on the BD MAX showed a sensitivity of 99.5% (95% CI: 97.3-100) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI: 97.4-99.8) for detection of Influenza A virus. The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 98.5% (95% CI: 95.8-99.7) and 99.7% (95% CI: 98.3-100) respectively. Influenza B virus detection could not be evaluated due to a low positivity rate. The BD MAX platform offered the flexibility of several daily runs, shorter hands-on-time and shorter turnaround time than the in-house assay.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] The VIASURE assay on the BD MAX performed well and is now implemented in our clinical laboratory.
Copyright ? 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Commercial assay; Influenza; Molecular diagnostics; Respiratory

PMID: 29291537 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.12.010
 
Back
Top Bottom