• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of Ocular Findings in Patients with H1N1 Influenza Infection versus Patients Receiving Influenza Vaccine during a Pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Ophthalmic Res. 2012 May 9;48(3):134-138. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of Ocular Findings in Patients with H1N1 Influenza Infection versus Patients Receiving Influenza Vaccine during a Pandemic.
Mansour DE, El-Shazly AA, Elawamry AI, Ismail AT.
Source

Department of Ophthalmology, Ain Shams Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate ocular findings during the pandemic influenza A (H1N1) and after vaccination for the same strain. Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on 89 patients with H1N1 influenza infection (group 1) and 28 subjects who received vaccination for H1N1 (group 2). All patients were subjected to history taking, ophthalmological examination, fundus examination, conjunctival impression cytology and conjunctival swabs. Results: The patients' age ranged between 5 and 60 years (19.25 ? 11.70 years). Group 1 included 43 (48.1%) males and 46 (51.9%) females, while group 2 included 13 (46.43%) males and 15 (53.57%) females. The most common ocular finding of patients in group 1 was bilateral acute conjunctivitis in 58 cases (65.17%), while in group 2, we found 3 (10.71%) cases of mild conjunctivitis, and 2 (7.14%) cases of moderate conjunctivitis. Retinopathy, uveal affection, and optic neuritis were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Impression cytology of the conjunctiva for group 1 showed squamous metaplasia grade 3 with enlargement of epithelial cells, and fragmentation of the nucleus which is similar to virus-infected structural changes. Conclusion: Pandemic influenza H1N1 was able to induce different ocular manifestations including acute conjunctivitis, retinopathy, uveal effusion syndrome and optic neuritis.

Copyright ? 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PMID:
22572924
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22572924
 
Back
Top Bottom