• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent and tetravalent influenza vaccines in children and adolescents

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 13. pii: S0264-410X(19)31625-1. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.071. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Comparison of the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent and tetravalent influenza vaccines in children and adolescents.[/h]
Huang C[SUP]1[/SUP], Fu X[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhou Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Mi F[SUP]2[/SUP], Tian G[SUP]1[/SUP], Liu X[SUP]1[/SUP], Wu J[SUP]1[/SUP], Ding C[SUP]1[/SUP], Yan D[SUP]1[/SUP], Li L[SUP]1[/SUP], Yang S[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Children and adolescents are susceptible to influenza. Vaccination is the most important strategy for preventing influenza, yet there are few studies on the immunogenicity and safety of quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) containing two A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and two B lineages (Victoria and Yamagata). Therefore, to further clarify the immunogenicity and safety of QIV in children and adolescents, a meta-analysis was performed to provide a reference for the development of influenza prevention strategies.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for articles published as of February 12, 2019. Random clinical trials comparing the immunogenicity and safety of QIV and TIV among children and adolescents were selected. The main outcomes were comparisons of immunogenicity (seroprotection rate [SPR] and seroconversion rate [SCR] and adverse events using risk ratios (RRs). The meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Among the 6 months up to 3 years group, QIV showed a higher SPR for B lineages than for TIV-B/Yamagata, with pooled RRs of 3.07 (95% CI: 2.58-3.66) and 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01-1.11), respectively. For the 3 years through 18 years, QIV had a higher SCR and SPR for the Yamagata lineage than for TIV-B/Victoria, with pooled RRs of 2.30 (95% CI: 1.83-2.88) and 1.16 (95% CI: 1.03-1.30), respectively. Compared to TIV-B/Yamagata, a higher SCR and SPR for the Victoria lineage was found for QIV, with RRs of 3.09 (95% CI: 1.99-4.78) and 1.72 (95% CI: 1.22-2.41), respectively. Regarding adverse events, only pain was more frequently reported for QIV than TIV ; the RR was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02-1.17).
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] The immunogenicity of QIV for common ingredients was similar to that of TIV, but the former exhibited significantly higher immunogenicity for the unique lineage. QIV also had the same reliable safety as TIV.
Copyright ? 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Immunogenicity; Quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine; Safety; Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine

PMID: 31948819 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.071
 
Back
Top Bottom