• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of Turnaround Time (TAT) and Time to Oseltamivir Discontinuation between Two Respiratory Viral Panel Testing (RVP) Methodologies

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Microbiol. 2015 Jan 13. pii: jmm.0.000007. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000007. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Comparison of Turnaround Time (TAT) and Time to Oseltamivir Discontinuation between Two Respiratory Viral Panel Testing (RVP) Methodologies.[/h] Pettit N[SUP]1[/SUP], Matushek S[SUP]1[/SUP], Charnot-Katsikas A[SUP]1[/SUP], Tesic V[SUP]1[/SUP], Boonlayangoor S[SUP]1[/SUP], Brielmaier B[SUP]1[/SUP], Pisano J[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Multiplex PCR is highly sensitive and provides a more rapid turnaround time (TAT) compared to other respiratory viral testing methodologies. Our microbiology laboratory switched from the Luminex xTAG? RVP (detects 12 respiratory viruses with an assay time of 8.5 hours) to the Biofire Diagnostics, Inc. FilmArray?-RP (detects 17 respiratory viral and 3 bacterial targets with an assay time of 1.2 hours). We sought to compare the TAT between the two respiratory viral panels (RVP) performed at different frequencies and determine time to discontinuation of empiric oseltamivir. All adult patients with an RVP test result reported between 12/1/2011-2/28/2012 performed on Luminex xTAG? RVP (2-3 times/week) and 12/1/2012-2/28/2013 performed on FilmArray?-RP (24 hours/day, 7 days/week) were evaluated for average TAT. Among patients with influenza negative RVP results, time to discontinuation of empiric oseltamivir was determined. Average TAT for the Luminex xTAG? RVP performed 2-3x/week between 12/1/2011-2/28/2012 (N=230 assays) was 46.4 hours compared to an average TAT of 3.1 hours (p<0.001) for FilmArray?-RP performed 24 hours a day/7 days per week from 12/1/2012-2/28/13 (N=872 assays). The average time to discontinuation of empiric oseltamivir among patients with an RVP negative for influenza was 4 and 2 days for the Luminex? xTAG (N=42) and FilmArray? (N=75) groups, respectively (p<0.001). Consistent with previous literature showing that the TAT for FilmArray?-RP is, we observed a significantly shorter average TAT. We also found that the average duration of empiric oseltamivir was reduced by 50% with FilmArray?-RP.


PMID: 25587073 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25587073
 
Back
Top Bottom