• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Constrained Optimization for the Selection of Influenza Vaccines to Maximize the Population Benefit: A Demonstration Project

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Nov 22. doi: 10.1007/s40258-019-00534-y. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Constrained Optimization for the Selection of Influenza Vaccines to Maximize the Population Benefit: A Demonstration Project.[/h]
Standaert B[SUP]1[/SUP], Van Vlaenderen I[SUP]2[/SUP], Van Bellinghen LA[SUP]2[/SUP], Talbird S[SUP]3[/SUP], Hicks K[SUP]3[/SUP], Carrico J[SUP]3[/SUP], Buck PO[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h] 1 GSK, Wavre, Belgium. baudouin.a.standaert@gsk.com. 2 CHESS in Health, Bonheiden, Belgium. 3 RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 4 GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Influenza is an infectious disease causing a high annual economic and public health burden. The most efficient management of the disease is through prevention with vaccination. Many influenza vaccines are available, with varying efficacy and cost, targeting different age groups. Therefore, strategic decision-making about which vaccine to deliver to whom is warranted to improve efficiency.
[h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] We present the use of a constrained optimization (CO) model to evaluate targeted strategies for providing influenza vaccines in three adult age groups in the USA.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] CO was considered for identifying an influenza vaccine provision strategy that maximizes the benefits at constrained annual budgets, by prioritizing vaccines based on return on investment. The approach optimizes a set of predefined outcome measures over several years resulting from an increasing investment using the best combination of influenza vaccines.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Results indicate the importance of understanding the relative differences in benefits for each vaccine type within and across age groups. Scenario and threshold analyses demonstrate the impact of changing budget distribution over time, price setting per vaccine type, and selection of outcome measure to optimize.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Significant gains in cost efficiency can be realized for a decision maker using a CO model, especially for a disease like influenza with many vaccine options. Testing the model under different scenarios offers powerful insights into maximum achievable benefit overall and per age group within the predefined constraints of a vaccine budget.


PMID: 31755016 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00534-y
 
Back
Top Bottom