• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus trivalent influenza vaccine for elderly in Hong Kong

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 25;14(1):618. [Epub ahead of print]
Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus trivalent influenza vaccine for elderly in Hong Kong.
You J, Ming WK, Chan P.
Abstract

BackgroundCost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained by quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) versus trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) in Hong Kong elderly were estimated over 9 seasons.MethodsTIV-unmatched influenza B infection rates with QIV versus TIV were estimated by an epidemiology model. Model parameters included percentages of influenza B lineages in circulation, influenza B-associated hospital admission, age-specific population, vaccine coverage and effectiveness. Incremental cost per QALY gained (ICER) by QIV versus TIV were estimated from Hong Kong?s societal perspective.ResultsMean reduction in influenza B infection rate was 191.3 (95%CI 45.1-337.5) per 100,000 population aged ?65 years. Highest cost savings and QALYs gained by QIV occurred in 2007 with high percentage of TIV-unmatched strain (92.9%) for age groups 65?79 years (USD266,473 and 22.8 QALYs) and ?80 years (USD483,461 and 27.3 QALYs). ICERs of QIV were below willingness-to-pay for age group 65?79 years in 6, 5 and 3 years when QIV cost?+?USD1?+?USD2 and?+?USD5 more than TIV, respectively. For age group ?80 years, ICERs of QIV were below willingness-to-pay in 7 and 5 years when QIV cost?+?USD1 and?+?USD5, correspondingly.ConclusionsAcceptance of QIV to be cost-effective in Hong Kong elderly was subject to QIV unit cost and percentage of circulating TIV-unmatched influenza B lineages.

PMID:
25420713
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Free full text

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25420713
 
Back
Top Bottom