• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cost-effectiveness of inactivated seasonal influenza vaccination in a cohort of Thai children ≤60 months of age

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183391. eCollection 2017.
[h=1]Cost-effectiveness of inactivated seasonal influenza vaccination in a cohort of Thai children ≤60 months of age.[/h] Kittikraisak W[SUP]1[/SUP], Suntarattiwong P[SUP]2[/SUP], Ditsungnoen D[SUP]1[/SUP], Pallas SE[SUP]3[/SUP], Abimbola TO[SUP]3[/SUP], Klungthong C[SUP]4[/SUP], Fernandez S[SUP]4[/SUP], Srisarang S[SUP]2[/SUP], Chotpitayasunondh T[SUP]2[/SUP], Dawood FS[SUP]5[/SUP], Olsen SJ[SUP]5[/SUP], Lindblade KA[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Vaccination is the best measure to prevent influenza. We conducted a cost-effectiveness evaluation of trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccination, compared to no vaccination, in children ≤60 months of age participating in a prospective cohort study in Bangkok, Thailand.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A static decision tree model was constructed to simulate the population of children in the cohort. Proportions of children with laboratory-confirmed influenza were derived from children followed weekly. The societal perspective and one-year analytic horizon were used for each influenza season; the model was repeated for three influenza seasons (2012-2014). Direct and indirect costs associated with influenza illness were collected and summed. Cost of the trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine (IIV3) including promotion, administration, and supervision cost was added for children who were vaccinated. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY), derived from literature, were used to quantify health outcomes. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the difference in the expected total costs between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups divided by the difference in QALYs for both groups.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Compared to no vaccination, IIV3 vaccination among children ≤60 months in our cohort was not cost-effective in the introductory year (2012 season; 24,450 USD/QALY gained), highly cost-effective in the 2013 season (554 USD/QALY gained), and cost-effective in the 2014 season (16,200 USD/QALY gained).
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] The cost-effectiveness of IIV3 vaccination among children participating in the cohort study varied by influenza season, with vaccine cost and proportion of high-risk children demonstrating the greatest influence in sensitivity analyses. Vaccinating children against influenza can be economically favorable depending on the maturity of the program, influenza vaccine performance, and target population.


PMID: 28837594 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183391
 
Back
Top Bottom