• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Crit Care Med . Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients: A Cluster Analysis According to Baseline Char

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Crit Care Med


. 2023 Oct 27.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006105. Online ahead of print. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients: A Cluster Analysis According to Baseline Characteristics, Biological Features, and Chest CT Scan on Admission

Kévin Grapin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Romain De Bauchene[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Benjamin Bonnet[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Audrey Mirand[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Lucie Cassagnes[SUP] 2 7 [/SUP], Laure Calvet[SUP] 1 [/SUP], François Thouy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Radhia Bouzgarrou[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cécile Henquell[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Bertrand Evrard[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Mireille Adda[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bertrand Souweine[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Claire Dupuis[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Inconsistent results from COVID-19 studies raise the issue of patient heterogeneity.
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify homogeneous subgroups of patients (clusters) using baseline characteristics including inflammatory biomarkers and the extent of lung parenchymal lesions on CT, and to compare their outcomes.
Design: Retrospective single-center study.
Setting: Medical ICU of the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Patients: All consecutive adult patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years, admitted between March 20, 2020, and August 31, 2021, for COVID-19 pneumonia.
Interventions: Characteristics at baseline, during ICU stay, and outcomes at day 60 were recorded. On the chest CT performed at admission the extent of lung parenchyma lesions was established by artificial intelligence software.
Measurements and main results: Clusters were determined by hierarchical clustering on principal components using principal component analysis of admission characteristics including plasma interleukin-6, human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-DR expression rate on blood monocytes (HLA-DR) monocytic-expression rate (mHLA-DR), and the extent of lung parenchymal lesions. Factors associated with day 60 mortality were investigated by univariate survival analysis. Two hundred seventy patients were included. Four clusters were identified and three were fully described. Cluster 1 (obese patients, with moderate hypoxemia, moderate extent of lung parenchymal lesions, no inflammation, and no down-regulation of mHLA-DR) had a better prognosis at day 60 (hazard ratio
= 0.27 [0.15-0.46], p < 0.01), whereas cluster 2 (older patients with comorbidities, moderate extent of lung parenchyma lesions but significant hypoxemia, inflammation, and down-regulation of mHLA-DR) and cluster 3 (patients with severe parenchymal disease, hypoxemia, inflammatory reaction, and down-regulation of mHLA-DR) had an increased risk of mortality (HR = 2.07 [1.37-3.13], p < 0.01 and HR = 1.52 [1-2.32], p = 0.05, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only clusters 1 and 2 were independently associated with day 60 death.
Conclusions: Three clusters with distinct characteristics and outcomes were identified. Such clusters could facilitate the identification of targeted populations for the next trials.


 
Back
Top Bottom