• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cumulative Clinical Experience with MF59-Adjuvanted Trivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Young Children

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Infect Dis. 2019 May 13. pii: S1201-9712(19)30215-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.05.009. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Cumulative Clinical Experience with MF59-Adjuvanted Trivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Young Children.[/h] Patel SS[SUP]1[/SUP], Bizjajeva S[SUP]2[/SUP], Lindert K[SUP]1[/SUP], Heijnen E[SUP]3[/SUP], Oberye J[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To demonstrate the potential of an MF59-adjuvanted inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (aIIV3; Fluad?), to improve the immune response in young children, we review the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety/tolerability of aIIV3 from a comprehensive clinical development program in a pediatric population with a specific need for improved influenza vaccines.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Data were analyzed from a series of 1 phase 1b, 3 phase ii, and 2 phase III studies involving 11,942 children aged 6 months through 5 years.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The clinical data showed that aIIV3 had statistically significantly greater immunogenicity and efficacy in the prevention of influenza compared to conventional inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccines (IIV3s). The safety profile of aIIV3 was generally similar to that of nonadjuvanted IIV3, apart from an increased frequency of solicited adverse events (AEs) following vaccination. The majority of solicited AEs were mild or moderate in severity and resolved within 1 to 2 days.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] aIIV3 was well tolerated, with immunogenicity and efficacy exceeding that of conventional IIV3 in children 6 months through 5 years of age. The MF59-adjuvanted vaccine has the potential to fulfill an unmet clinical need in the prevention of seasonal influenza in this age group.
Copyright ? 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] MF59; adjuvant; children; influenza; vaccine

PMID: 31096055 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.05.009
Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom