• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Development of screening method for intranasal influenza vaccine and adjuvant safety in preclinical study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Biologicals. 2018 Jul 13. pii: S1045-1056(18)30213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.07.001. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Development of screening method for intranasal influenza vaccine and adjuvant safety in preclinical study.[/h] Hiradate Y[SUP]1[/SUP], Sasaki E[SUP]1[/SUP], Momose H[SUP]1[/SUP], Asanuma H[SUP]2[/SUP], Furuhata K[SUP]1[/SUP], Takai M[SUP]1[/SUP], Aoshi T[SUP]3[/SUP], Yamada H[SUP]4[/SUP], Ishii KJ[SUP]5[/SUP], Tanemura K[SUP]6[/SUP], Mizukami T[SUP]7[/SUP], Hamaguchi I[SUP]8[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Recently, many vaccine adjuvants have been developed; however, most of the newly developed adjuvants have been dropped out of preclinical and clinical trials owing to their unexpected toxicity. Thus, the development of highly quantitative and comparable screening methods for evaluating adjuvant safety is needed. In a previous study, we identified specific biomarkers for evaluating the safety of an intranasal influenza vaccine with CpG K3 adjuvant by comparing biomarker expression. We hypothesized that these biomarkers might be useful for screening newly developed adjuvant safety. We compared the expression of biomarkers in mouse lungs by the intranasal administration of 4 types of adjuvants: Alum, Pam[SUB]3[/SUB]CSK[SUB]4[/SUB], NanoSiO[SUB]2[/SUB], and DMXAA with subvirion influenza vaccine. The control adjuvant alum did not show any significant increase in biomarker expression or preclinical parameters; however, NanoSiO[SUB]2[/SUB] and Pam[SUB]3[/SUB]CSK[SUB]4[/SUB] increased the expression of biomarkers, such as Timp1 and Csf1. DMXAA at 300 μg induced the expression of over 80% of biomarkers. Hierarchical clustering analysis showed that 300 μg DMXAA was classified in the toxicity reference whole-particle influenza vaccine cluster. FACS analysis to confirm specific phenotypes that the number of T cells decreased in DMXAA-treated mouse lungs. Thus, our biomarkers are useful for initial adjuvant safety and toxicity screening.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Adjuvant; Alum; Biomarkers; DMXAA; NanoSiO(2); Pam(3)CSK(4); Preclinical study; QuantiGene plex; Vaccine safety

PMID: 30017557 DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2018.07.001
 
Back
Top Bottom