• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis . Evaluation of the COVID-19 diagnostic performance of Rapiim SARS-CoV-2-H, the highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 antigen qual

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis


. 2024 Nov 7;111(1):116598.
doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116598. Online ahead of print. Evaluation of the COVID-19 diagnostic performance of Rapiim SARS-CoV-2-H, the highly sensitive SARS-CoV-2 antigen qualitative test kit

Nobumasa Okumura[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hideaki Kato[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kei Yamamoto[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Eri Hagiwara[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Masami Kurokawa[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sayaka Hikida[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Taketomo Maruki[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kazuhisa Mezaki[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Katsushi Tanaka[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Takashi Ogura[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Norio Ohmagari[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Rapiim SARS-CoV-2-H (Rapiim-H)-a point-of-care qualitative antigen test-using nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and saliva samples and compared its results with those from antigen quantification and nucleic acid amplification tests. NPS and saliva were collected from patients with confirmed and suspected coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In total, 142 NPS and saliva samples were collected. In symptomatic cases, in which the first NPS sample was collected within 10 days of disease onset, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for COVID-19 diagnosis were 91.7 %, 88.6 %, 93.2 %, and 86.1 %, respectively. A similar analysis was performed on saliva samples, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 50.8 %, 91.4 %, 91.2 %, and 51.6 %, respectively. The Rapiim-H test using NPS demonstrated approximately 90 % sensitivity and specificity, particularly within the first 10 days after disease onset.

Keywords: Antigen test; COVID-19; Nasopharyngeal swab; Rapid diagnostic test; Rapiim-SARS-CoV-2-H; Saliva.

 
Back
Top Bottom