• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

EClinicalMedicine . A phase 2/3, participant-blind, observer-blind, randomised, controlled study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of SII-ChA

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
EClinicalMedicine


. 2021 Nov 30;101218.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101218. Online ahead of print.
A phase 2/3, participant-blind, observer-blind, randomised, controlled study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (COVID-19 vaccine) in adults in India


Prasad S Kulkarni[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chandrasekaran Padmapriyadarsini[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Johan Vekemans[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ashish Bavdekar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Madhu Gupta[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Praveen Kulkarni[SUP] 6 [/SUP], B S Garg[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Nithya J Gogtay[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Muralidhar Tambe[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Sanjay Lalwani[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Kiranjit Singh[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Renuka Munshi[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Sushant Meshram[SUP] 13 [/SUP], T S Selvavinayagam[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Krishna Pandey[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Devi Madhavi Bhimarasetty[SUP] 16 [/SUP], S R Ramakrishnan[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Chetanraj Bhamare[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Abhijeet Dharmadhikari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rajeev Vadakkedath[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Cyrille J Bonhomme[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Madhuri Thakar[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Swarali N Kurle[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Elizabeth J Kelly[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Manish Gautam[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nivedita Gupta[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Samiran Panda[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Balram Bhargava[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Umesh Shaligram[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dhananjay Kapse[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Bhagwat Gunale[SUP] 1 [/SUP], COVISHIELD Study Group



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: This phase 2/3 immunobridging study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Coronavirus Vaccine (Recombinant) (SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), manufactured in India at the Serum Institute of India Pvt Ltd (SIIPL), following technology transfer from the AstraZeneca.
Methods: This participant-blind, observer-blind study randomised participants 3:1 to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) (immunogenicity/reactogenicity cohort) and 3:1 to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or placebo (safety cohort). The study participants were enrolled from 14 hospitals across India between August 25 and October 31, 2020. Two doses of study products were given 4 weeks apart. The primary objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 to AZD1222 in terms of geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibodies 28 days after the second dose (defined as lower limit of 95% CI >0·67) and to determine the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) causally related to SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. The anti-spike IgG response was assessed using a multiplexed electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay. Safety follow-up continued until 6 months after first dose. Trial registration: CTRI/2020/08/027170.
Findings: 1601 participants were enrolled: 401 to the immunogenicity/reactogenicity cohort and 1200 to the safety cohort. After two doses, seroconversion rates for anti-spike IgG antibodies were more than 98·0% in both the groups. SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was non-inferior to AZD1222 (GMT ratio 0·98; 95% CI 0·78-1·23). SAEs were reported in ≤ 2·0% participants across the three groups; none were causally related. A total of 34 SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported; of which 6 occurred more than 2 weeks after the second dose; none were severe.
Interpretation: SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 has a non-inferior immune response compared to AZD1222 and an acceptable safety/reactogenicity profile. Pharmacovigilance should be maintained to detect any safety signals.
Funding: SIIPL funded the contract research organisation and laboratory costs, while the site costs were funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research. The study vaccines were supplied by SIIPL and AstraZeneca.

Keywords: AZD1222; COVID-19; Immunogenicity; SII-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19; Safety.
 
Back
Top Bottom